Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34669158›Full record

ArticleHuman nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.)2021

The Relative Importance of "Cooperative Context" and Kinship in Structuring Cooperative Behavior : A Comparative Study of Saami Reindeer Herders.

Guro Lovise Hole Fisktjønmo, Marius Warg Næss, Bård-Jørgen Bårdsen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guro Lovise Hole FisktjønmoHigh North Department, Fram Centre, Norwegian Institute for Cultural Heritage Research, 9296, Tromsø, Norway. guro.fisktjonmo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7907-2554
Marius Warg NæssHigh North Department, Fram Centre, Norwegian Institute for Cultural Heritage Research, 9296, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2973-5954
Bård-Jørgen BårdsenArctic Ecology Department, Fram Centre, Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, 9296, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6818-5249
Norwegian Institute for Cultural Heritage Research · NONorwegian Institute for Nature Research · NO

Funding

Nordic Centre of Excellence 76915Norges Forskningsråd 240280The Terrestrial flagship, Fram Centre 362257The Terrestrial flagship, Fram Centre 369902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kin relations have a strong theoretical and empirical basis for explaining cooperative behavior. Nevertheless, there is growing recognition that context-the cooperative environment of an individual-also shapes the willingness of individuals to cooperate. For nomadic pastoralists in Norway, cooperation among both kin and non-kin is an essential predictor for success. The northern parts of the country are characterized by a history of herder-herder competition exacerbating between-herder conflict, lack of trust, and subsequent coordination problems. In contrast, because of a history of herder-farmer competition, southern Norway is characterized by high levels of between-herder coordination and trust. This comparative study investigates the relative importance of "cooperative context" and kinship in structuring cooperative behavior using an experimental gift game. The main findings from this study were that in the South, a high level of cooperation around an individual pushes gifts to be distributed evenly among other herders. Nevertheless, kinship matters, since close kin give and receive larger gifts. In contrast, kinship seems to be the main factor affecting gift distribution in the North. Herders in the North are also concerned with distributing gifts equally, albeit limiting them to close kin: the level of intragroup cooperation drives gifts to be distributed evenly among other closely related herders. The observed regional contrasts in cooperative decisions fit with the different historical levels of conflict and trust in the two regions: whereas herders in the South are affected by both cooperative context and kinship, kinship seems to be the main determinant of cooperation in the North.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorReindeerAnimalsFarmersHumansCollaborationKin selectionNomadic pastoralismReciprocal altruismReindeer herdingSocial groups

Identifiers

PMID34669158
PMCPMC8526998
OpenAlexW3206156892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.