Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34669113›Full record

ArticleCurrent medical science2022

Adjuvant Chemotherapy versus Radiotherapy in High-risk, Early-stage Endometrioid Endometrial Carcinoma.

Min Wu, Ya-Nan Yang, Yu-Hui Huang, Jing Cai, Xiao-Qi He, Ze-Hua Wang

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Min WuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Ya-Nan YangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Yu-Hui HuangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Jing CaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Xiao-Qi HeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China. hexiaoqiqi@hotmail.com.
Ze-Hua WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China. zehuawang@163.net.
Huazhong University of Science and Technology · CNUnion Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe present study was designed to evaluate the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) vs. radiotherapy (RT, alone or combined with CT) on the prognosis of patients with high-risk, early-stage (stage I and stage II) endometrioid endometrial carcinoma.

methodsThis single-center retrospective clinical study was conducted in Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology between 2010 and 2019. In the present study, endometrioid endometrial carcinoma patients, who underwent total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy followed by postoperative adjuvant CT or RT (alone or combined with CT), and were diagnosed with stage IA grade 2/3 with lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI), and stage IB with two or more uterine risks, including old age, histological grade 2 or 3, LVSI and stage II, were included. According to the postoperative adjuvant therapy, all eligible patients were divided into two groups: CT group and RT (RT±CT) group. The primary objective was to investigate overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between the CT and RT groups. Grade 3 or worse adverse events were also presented in the present study.

resultsA total of 145 eligible patients were included. Among these patients, 97 patients underwent adjuvant CT and 48 patients underwent adjuvant RT (RT±CT). The median follow-up was 47.2 months, and the five-year OS rate was 92.7% in the CT group and 88.6 % in the RT group [hazard ratio (HR): 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.22-2.99). The 5-year DFS rate for the two groups was 85.7% and 80.2%, respectively (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.33-2.05). The cumulative incidence of local-regional disease recurrence at 60 months of follow-up was 6.2% in the CT group and 6.3% in the RT group (HR=1.11; 95%CI: 0.28-4.35). The cumulative incidence of distant recurrence at 60 months of follow-up was 5.2% in the CT group and 10.4% in the RT group (HR=0.65; 95%CI: 0.19-2.24). Both groups of patients were well-tolerant, and the only grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia.

conclusionThere was no difference in efficacy for adjuvant CT or adjuvant RT (RT±CT) in high-risk, early-stage endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. CT exhibited a trend of reducing the distant relapse, although there was no significant difference, when compared with adjuvant RT (RT±CT).

Indexed as

Neoplasm StagingOutcome Assessment, Health CareAdultAgedCarcinoma, EndometrioidChemoradiotherapyChemotherapy, AdjuvantEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesRiskchemotherapyendometrioid endometrial carcinomaradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID34669113
OpenAlexW3206634301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.