Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34669110›Full record

ArticleApplied biochemistry and biotechnology2021

Prediction of Micronucleus Assay Outcome Using In Vivo Activity Data and Molecular Structure Features.

Priyanka Ramesh, Shanthi Veerappapillai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Priyanka RameshDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Shanthi VeerappapillaiDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India. shanthi.v@vit.ac.in.
Vellore Institute of Technology University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vivo micronucleus assay is the widely used genotoxic test to determine the extent of chromosomal aberrations caused by the chemicals in human beings, which plays a significant role in the drug discovery paradigm. To reduce the uncertainties of the in vivo experiments and the expenses, we intended to develop novel machine learning-based tools to predict the toxicity of the compounds with high precision. A total of 372 compounds with known toxicity information were retrieved from the PubChem Bioassay database and literature. The fingerprints and descriptors of the compounds were generated using PaDEL and ChemSAR, respectively, for the analysis. The performance of the models was assessed using the three tires of evaluation strategies such as fivefold, tenfold, and validation by external dataset. Further, structural alerts causing genotoxicity of the compounds were identified using SARpy method. Of note, fingerprint-based random forest model built in our analysis is able to demonstrate the highest accuracy of about 0.97 during tenfold cross-validation. In essence, our study highlights that structural alerts such as chlorocyclohexane and trimethylamine are likely to be the leading cause of toxicity in humans. Indeed, we believe that random forest model generated in this study is appropriate for reduction of test animals and should be considered in the future for the good practice of animal welfare.

Indexed as

Biological AssayComputer SimulationDatabases, FactualMachine LearningMicronucleus TestsModels, BiologicalAnimalsHumansMolecular StructureDescriptorsFingerprintsMachine learningStructural alertsToxicity prediction

Identifiers

PMID34669110
OpenAlexW3186443604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.