Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34669090›Full record

ArticleCommunity mental health journal2022

A Qualitative Study of the Working Alliance in the Strengths Model of Case Management with People with Severe Mental Illness.

Maryann Roebuck, Tim Aubry, Stéphanie Manoni-Millar

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maryann RoebuckSchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada. mroebuck@uottawa.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-9817-2115
Tim AubrySchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada.
Stéphanie Manoni-MillarSchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine clients' perceptions of the client-case manager working alliance in the context of receiving the Strengths Model of Case Management. Twenty people with severe mental illness, with a SMCM case manager, participated in semi-structured, qualitative interviews. Using first and second cycle coding, data were analyzed thematically. People in the study attributed personal life changes to their relationship with their case manager. They valued their case managers' flexibility and highlighted their work on a wide range of goals of their choosing. Case managers approached the SMCM intervention responsive to their clients' preferences and choices. The working alliance serves as a key element of the SMCM intervention. Clients describe the working alliance as helping to improve their lives. This study supports the implementation of SMCM with people with severe mental illness due to its focus on fostering a strong working alliance.

Indexed as

Case ManagersMental DisordersCase ManagementHumansProfessional-Patient RelationsQualitative ResearchCase managementMental illnessStrengths modelTherapeutic allianceWorking alliance

Identifiers

PMID34669090
PMCPMC8527446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.