ReviewJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2021
MRI-derived proton density fat fraction.
Review in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnosing and defining MASLD in people living with chronic hepatitis B.Communications medicine · 2026Review
- Imaging-based fibrosis assessment and risk stratification in MASLD.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Prospective multicenter study on the reproducibility of ultrasound-derived fat fraction in assessing hepatic steatosis.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Reliability of Whole-Liver Liver-Fat-Quantification Between Deep Learning-Accelerated and Standard Volumetric Interpolated Breath-hold Examination Dixon Sequences in a Prospective Oncology Cohort.Investigative radiology · 2025Article
- Correlation between Liver fat Content Determined by Ultrasonic Attenuation Imaging and Lipid Metabolism in Patients with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseCurrent medical imaging · 2025Article
- Global Trends in Non-Invasive Techniques for the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
- Methods and Validation of Velacur Determined Fat Fraction in patients with MASLD.WFUMB ultrasound open · 2024Article
- Non-Invasive Measurement of Hepatic Fibrosis by Transient Elastography: A Narrative Review.Viruses · 2023Review
- Advances in application of novel magnetic resonance imaging technologies in liver disease diagnosis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Strategies and Techniques for Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging: New and Pending Applications for Routine Clinical Practice.Korean journal of radiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reflecting the growing interest in early diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in recent years, the development of noninvasive and reliable fat quantification methods is required. Fat quantification by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), especially MRI-derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) obtained by quantitative chemical shift imaging such as the multi-point Dixon method, is highly correlated with histological evaluation and fat quantification with MR spectroscopy (MRS). In recent years, MRI-PDFF has been increasingly used as a reference standard for image-based fat quantification instead of MRS because it is possible to evaluate the whole liver with a single breath-hold. Furthermore, recent advances in MR imaging have led to the application of multiparametric MRI for the diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with specific liver tissue quantification of fat, iron, and fibrosis. One of the advantages of multiparametric MRI is that whole organ imaging to exclude sampling variability and organ-specific tissue quantification can be done simultaneously. Therefore, multiparametric MRI methods offer an attractive option for noninvasive and comprehensive liver assessment beyond the quantitative assessment of liver steatosis. In this review article, we mainly focus on a technical explanation and clinical interpretation of MRI-PDFF in the quantitative assessment of liver steatosis. Furthermore, we would like to mention future perspectives of MR imaging of the liver in relation to elastography and other specific multiparametric MRI methods such as R2* and T1 mapping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.