Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34669049›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2021

Impact of land cover change on urban tree cover and potential regulating ecosystem services: the case of Aydın/Turkey.

Ebru Ersoy Tonyaloğlu, Birsen Kesgin Atak

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ebru Ersoy TonyaloğluFaculty of Agriculture, Department of Landscape Architecture, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey. ebru.ersoy@adu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2945-3885
Birsen Kesgin AtakFaculty of Architecture, Department of Landscape Architecture, İzmir Demokrasi University, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4786-0801

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The availability of urban tree cover (UTC) is one of the most important components of healthy urban environments that support the provision of many ecosystem services. The development in Turkey keeps going within/around urban environments, and the degradation and loss of urban vegetation and associated ecosystem services continues. In this study, we aimed to assess the impacts of land cover change on UTC and ecosystem services provided by them in the case of Efeler District, in Aydın Province of Turkey between 2004 and 2021. The ecosystem services and benefits estimated with the i-Tree Canopy tool includes carbon sequestration and storage as well as the removal of nitrogen dioxide, ozone, sulphur dioxide, PM2.5 and PM10 as well as their economic valuation. Our results show that there was a decline trend in UTC between the years of 2004 and 2021. The loss of UTC was caused by the combined effects of new development pressure in and around the natural/semi-natural and agricultural areas, as well as the new reconstruction sites around old settlements. During the last 17 years, the loss of 61.38 ha UTC created a decrease in the carbon and air pollution benefits and economic valuation estimates. It would be premature to make direct use of our results in planning, without further analysis of the composition and age structure of tree/shrub species. However, the approach used in this study does demonstrate the principle and potential nature of such a methodology where comprehensive analysis are limited by the lack of sufficient data, time and labour.

Indexed as

EcosystemTreesCarbon SequestrationEnvironmental MonitoringTurkeyAir qualityCarbonEcosystem servicesi-Tree CanopyUrbanisation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.