SynthesisClinical oral investigations2022
Soft tissue dimensional changes after alveolar ridge preservation using different sealing materials: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Clinical oral investigations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of collagen sponge and xenografts versus collagen sponge alone in alveolar ridge preservation: a randomized controlled clinical trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- [Evaluation of the clinical effect of concentrated growth factor combined with sticky bone in maxillary anterior alveolar ridge preservation].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2025Trial
- Post-extraction volumetric analysis of alveolar ridge contour using subepithelial connective tissue graft in esthetic zone: a randomized controlled clinical trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Trial
- Review
- Five-Year Retrospective Radiographic Analysis of Peri-Implant Bone Stability: A Comparison Between Two Socket Preservation Protocols and Spontaneous Healing.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Effect of reactive soft tissue combined with injectable platelet-rich fibrin for alveolar ridge preservation in severe defect molar sites: a retrospective cohort study.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Analysis of Soft Tissue Healing Over Socket Orifice Sealed with Platelet-Rich Fibrin Membrane.European journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Virtual and clinical implant placement after ridge preservation in periodontally compromised molars: retrospective study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Do Collagenated Xenogenic Bone Substitutes Enhance Gingival Healing and Angiogenesis Through a Barrier Membrane? An In Vitro Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- CBCT assessment of crestal bone changes and stability: Immediate versus delayed implant placement in grafted sites.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Observational
- The Use of Flowable Decellularized Human Placental Connective Tissue Matrix in Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Split-Mouth Pilot Study.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Alveolar ridge height changes in adults and adolescents with angle class I malocclusion before and after orthodontic treatment.African health sciences · 2025Article
- 3D surface defect map for assessing buccolingual profile of single tooth gaps following alveolar ridge preservation.Clinical implant dentistry and related research · 2024Article
- The Long-Term Esthetic and Radiographic Outcome of Implants Placed in the Anterior Maxilla after Ridge Preservation, Combining Bovine Xenograft with Collagen Matrix.Dentistry journal · 2024Article
- Bone Regeneration: Overview and Future Trends.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Tooth as graft material: Histologic study.Clinical implant dentistry and related research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlveolar ridge preservation (ARP) is a proactive treatment option aiming at attenuating post-extraction hard and soft tissue dimensional changes. A high number of different types of biomaterials have been utilized during ARP to seal the socket, but their effectiveness in terms of soft tissue outcomes has rarely been investigated and compared in the literature.
objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of different types of membranes and graft materials in terms of soft tissue outcomes (keratinized tissue width changes, vertical buccal height, and horizontal changes) after ARP, and to assign relative rankings based on their performance. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe manuscript represents the proceedings of a consensus conference of the Italian Society of Osseointegration (IAO). PUBMED (Medline), SCOPUS, Embase, and Cochrane Oral Health's Information Specialist were utilized to conduct the search up to 06 April 2021. English language restrictions were placed and no limitations were set on publication date. Randomized controlled trials that report ARP procedures using different sealing materials, assessing soft tissue as a primary or secondary outcome, with at least 6-week follow-up were included. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed using mean, standard deviation, sample size, bias, and follow-up duration for all included studies. Network geometry, contribution plots, inconsistency plots, predictive and confidence interval plots, SUCRA (surface under the cumulative ranking curve) rankings, and multidimensional (MDS) ranking plots were constructed.
resultsA total of 11 studies were included for NMA. Overall, the level of bias for included studies was moderate. Crosslinked collagen membranes (SUCRA rank 81.8%) performed best in vertical buccal height (VBH), autogenous soft tissue grafts (SUCRA rank 89.1%) in horizontal width change (HWch), and control (SUCRA rank 85.8%) in keratinized mucosa thickness (KMT).
conclusionsNMA confirmed that the use of crosslinked collagen membranes and autogenous soft tissue grafts represented the best choices for sealing sockets during ARP in terms of minimizing post-extraction soft tissue dimensional shrinkage. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Grafting materials demonstrated statistically significantly better performances in terms of soft tissue thickness and vertical buccal height changes, when covered with crosslinked collagen membranes. Instead, soft tissue grafts performed better in horizontal width changes. Non-crosslinked membranes and other materials or combinations presented slightly inferior outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.