Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34669000›Full record

ArticleArchives of environmental contamination and toxicology2022

Effect of Activated Carbon in Thin Sand Caps Challenged with Ongoing PCB Inputs from Sediment Deposition: PCB Uptake in Clams (Mercenaria mercenaria) and Passive Samplers.

Philip T Gidley, Guilherme R Lotufo, Alan J Kennedy, Nicolas L Melby, Allyson H Wooley, Charles H Laber, Robert M Burgess, Carlos E Ruiz, Todd S Bridges

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 56% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Philip T GidleyEnvironmental Laboratory, ERDC, US Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, MS, USA. philip.t.gidley@erdc.dren.mil.
Guilherme R LotufoEnvironmental Laboratory, ERDC, US Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, MS, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1640-1752
Alan J KennedyEnvironmental Laboratory, ERDC, US Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, MS, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2319-3725
Nicolas L MelbyEnvironmental Laboratory, ERDC, US Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, MS, USA.
Allyson H WooleyEnvironmental Laboratory, ERDC, US Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, MS, USA.
Charles H LaberEnvironmental Laboratory, ERDC, US Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, MS, USA.
Robert M BurgessOffice of Research and Development (ORD), National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory (NHEERL), Atlantic Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Narragansett, RI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4504-5125
Carlos E RuizEnvironmental Laboratory, ERDC, US Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, MS, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5618-9995
Todd S BridgesEnvironmental Laboratory, ERDC, US Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, MS, USA.
United States Army Corps of Engineers · USEnvironmental Protection Agency · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program ER-2431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ongoing inputs, in the form of sediment deposition along with associated dissolved contaminants, have challenged the assessment of cap performance at contaminated sediment sites. To address this issue, thin 2-3 cm layer sand caps amended with activated carbon (AC) were investigated for the remediation of polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) contaminated marine sediments using 90-day mesocosms. All treatments were challenged with (1) ongoing clean or marker-PCB-spiked sediment inputs and (2) bioturbation. Bioaccumulation in hard clams (filter feeding near the cap-water interface) was evaluated to best understand cap effectiveness, relative to sheepshead minnows (confined to the surface water) and sandworms (which burrowed through the caps). All caps (sand and AC amended sand) provided isolation of native bedded PCBs (i.e., PCBs sourced from the bed), reducing uptake in organisms. Total PCB bioaccumulation in clams indicated that AC addition to the cap provided no benefit with spiked influx, or some benefit (56% reduction) with clean influx. Spiked input PCBs, when added to the depositional input sediment, were consistently detected in clams and passive samplers, with and without AC in the cap. PCB uptake by passive samplers located in the caps did not reflect the performance of the remedy, as defined by clam bioaccumulation. However, PCB uptake by passive samplers in the overlying water reasonably represented clam bioaccumulation results.

Indexed as

MercenariaPolychlorinated BiphenylsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsCharcoalGeologic SedimentsSandCharcoalPolychlorinated BiphenylsSandWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID34669000
PMCPMC9093667
OpenAlexW3206323034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.