Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34668944›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Association Between Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure and the Efficacy of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure-Lowering Therapy.

Andrew J Foy, Edward J Filippone, Eric Schaefer, Matt Nudy, Mohammed Ruzieh, Anne-Marie Dyer, Vernon M Chinchilli, Gerald V Naccarelli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The diastolic blood pressure J-curve revisited: An update.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew J FoyDepartment of Medicine, Penn State University Heart and Vascular Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Edward J FilipponeDepartment of Medicine, Sydney Kimmel Medical Center at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Eric SchaeferDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center and College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Matt NudyDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center and College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Mohammed RuziehDepartment of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Anne-Marie DyerDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center and College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Vernon M ChinchilliDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center and College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Gerald V NaccarelliDepartment of Medicine, Penn State University Heart and Vascular Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USThomas Jefferson University Hospital · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Low diastolic blood pressure (DBP) has been found to be associated with increased adverse cardiovascular events; however, it is unknown whether intensifying blood pressure therapy in patients with an already low DBP to achieve a lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) target is safe or effective. Objective: To evaluate whether there is an association of baseline DBP and intensification of blood pressure-lowering therapy with the outcomes of all-cause death and cardiovascular events. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study analyzed patients who were randomized to intensive or standard BP control in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes-Blood Pressure (ACCORD-BP) trial and Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT). Data were collected from September 1999 to June 2009 (ACCORD-BP) and from October 2010 to August 2015 (SPRINT). Data were analyzed from December 2020 to June 2021. Exposures: Baseline DBP as a continuous variable. Main Outcomes and Measures: All-cause death and a composite cardiovascular end point (CVE) that included cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke. Results: A total of 14 094 patients (mean [SD] age, 66.2 [8.9] years; 8504 [60.4%] men) were included in this analysis. There were significant nonlinear associations between baseline DBP and all-cause death (eg, baseline DBP 50 vs 80 mm Hg: hazard ratio [HR], 1.48; 95% CI, 1.06-2.08; P = .02) and the composite CVE (eg, baseline DBP 50 vs 80 mm Hg: HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.27-3.04; P = .003) observed among all participants. Findings for the interaction between baseline DBP and treatment group assignment for all cause death did not reach statistical significance. For intensive vs standard therapy, the HR of death for a baseline DBP of 50 mm Hg was 1.80 (95% CI, 0.95-3.39; P = .07) and that for a baseline DBP of 80 mm Hg was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.59-1.01; P = .05). Overall, there was no interaction found between baseline DBP and treatment group assignment for the composite CVE. Over the range of baseline DBP values, significant reductions in the composite CVE for patients assigned to intensive vs standard therapy were found for baseline DBP values of 80 mm Hg (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62-0.98; P = .03) and 90 mm Hg (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.55-0.98; P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance: This pooled cohort study found no evidence of a significant interaction between baseline DBP and treatment intensity for all-cause death or for a composite CVE. These results are hypothesis generating and merit further study.

Indexed as

Treatment OutcomeAgedAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureCohort StudiesFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID34668944
PMCPMC8529404
OpenAlexW3207518082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.