Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34668732›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2021

Transcriptomic and rRNA:rDNA Signatures of Environmental versus Enteric Enterococcus faecalis Isolates under Oligotrophic Freshwater Conditions.

Brittany Suttner, Minjae Kim, Eric R Johnston, Luis H Orellana, Carlos A Ruiz-Perez, Luis M Rodriguez-R, Janet K Hatt, Joe Brown, Jorge W Santo Domingo, Konstantinos T Konstantinidis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brittany SuttnerSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technologygrid.213917.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9004-4354
Minjae KimSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technologygrid.213917.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3157-3544
Eric R JohnstonSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technologygrid.213917.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Luis H OrellanaSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technologygrid.213917.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Carlos A Ruiz-PerezSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technologygrid.213917.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Luis M Rodriguez-RSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technologygrid.213917.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7603-3093
Janet K HattSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technologygrid.213917.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Joe BrownSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technologygrid.213917.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jorge W Santo DomingoU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Center for Environmental Solution and Emergency Response, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Konstantinos T KonstantinidisSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technologygrid.213917.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0954-4755
Georgia Institute of Technology · USOhio Environmental Protection Agency · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of enterococci as a fecal indicator bacterial group for public health risk assessment has been brought into question by recent studies showing that "naturalized" populations of Enterococcus faecalis exist in the extraenteric environment. The extent to which these naturalized E. faecalis organisms can confound water quality monitoring is unclear. To determine if strains isolated from different habitats display different survival strategies and responses, we compared the decay patterns of three E. faecalis isolates from the natural environment (environmental strains) against three human gut isolates (enteric strains) in laboratory mesocosms that simulate an oligotrophic, aerobic freshwater environment. Our results showed similar overall decay rates between enteric and environmental isolates based on viable plate and quantitative PCR (qPCR) counts. However, the enteric isolates exhibited a spike in copy number ratios of 16S rRNA gene transcripts to 16S rRNA gene DNA copies (rRNA:rDNA ratios) between days 1 and 3 of the mesocosm incubations that was not observed in environmental isolates, which could indicate a different stress response. Nevertheless, there was no strong evidence of differential gene expression between environmental and enteric isolates related to habitat adaptation in the accompanying mesocosm metatranscriptomes. Overall, our results provide novel information on how rRNA levels may vary over different growth conditions (e.g., standard lab versus oligotrophic) for this important indicator bacteria. We also observed some evidence for habitat adaptation in E. faecalis; however, this adaptation may not be substantial or consistent enough for integration in water quality monitoring.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalComputational BiologyDNA, RibosomalEnterococcus faecalisEnvironmental MonitoringFecesFresh WaterGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGene DosageHumansIntestinesRNA, Ribosomal, 16STranscriptomeWater MicrobiologyWater QualityDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sbioinformaticsenvironmental microbiologyfecal organismsmetatranscriptomicspublic healthrRNAwater quality

Identifiers

PMID34668732
PMCPMC8528121
OpenAlexW3207962452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.