Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34668571›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2022

Temporal scale of habitat selection for large carnivores: Balancing energetics, risk and finding prey.

Anna C Nisi, Justin P Suraci, Nathan Ranc, Laurence G Frank, Alayne Oriol-Cotterill, Steven Ekwanga, Terrie M Williams, Christopher C Wilmers

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Puma habitat preferences when moving and feeding predict the potential for human-carnivore conflict in shared landscapes.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Anna C NisiCenter for Integrated Spatial Research, Environmental Studies Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0286-3187
Justin P SuraciCenter for Integrated Spatial Research, Environmental Studies Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5952-2186
Nathan RancCenter for Integrated Spatial Research, Environmental Studies Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3167-2251
Laurence G FrankLiving with Lions, Mpala Research Centre, Nanyuki, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0003-3091-6768
Alayne Oriol-CotterillWildlife Conservation Research Unit, Zoology Department, Oxford University, Abingdon, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0049-7988
Steven EkwangaLiving with Lions, Mpala Research Centre, Nanyuki, Kenya.
Terrie M WilliamsEcology and Evolutionary Biology Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8170-009X
Christopher C WilmersCenter for Integrated Spatial Research, Environmental Studies Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2063-1478
University of California, Santa Cruz · USMpala Research Center and Wildlife Foundation · KEMuseum of Vertebrate Zoology · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When navigating heterogeneous landscapes, large carnivores must balance trade-offs between multiple goals, including minimizing energetic expenditure, maintaining access to hunting opportunities and avoiding potential risk from humans. The relative importance of these goals in driving carnivore movement likely changes across temporal scales, but our understanding of these dynamics remains limited. Here we quantified how drivers of movement and habitat selection changed with temporal grain for two large carnivore species living in human-dominated landscapes, providing insights into commonalities in carnivore movement strategies across regions. We used high-resolution GPS collar data and integrated step selection analyses to model movement and habitat selection for African lions Panthera leo in Laikipia, Kenya and pumas Puma concolor in the Santa Cruz Mountains of California across eight temporal grains, ranging from 5 min to 12 hr. Analyses considered landscape covariates that are related to energetics, resource acquisition and anthropogenic risk. For both species, topographic slope, which strongly influences energetic expenditure, drove habitat selection and movement patterns over fine temporal grains but was less important at longer temporal grains. In contrast, avoiding anthropogenic risk during the day, when risk was highest, was consistently important across grains, but the degree to which carnivores relaxed this avoidance at night was strongest for longer term movements. Lions and pumas modified their movement behaviour differently in response to anthropogenic features: lions sped up while near humans at fine temporal grains, while pumas slowed down in more developed areas at coarse temporal grains. Finally, pumas experienced a trade-off between energetically efficient movement and avoiding anthropogenic risk. Temporal grain is an important methodological consideration in habitat selection analyses, as drivers of both movement and habitat selection changed across temporal grain. Additionally, grain-dependent patterns can reflect meaningful behavioural processes, including how fitness-relevant goals influence behaviour over different periods of time. In applying multi-scale analysis to fine-resolution data, we showed that two large carnivore species in very different human-dominated landscapes balanced competing energetic and safety demands in largely similar ways. These commonalities suggest general strategies of landscape use across large carnivore species.

Indexed as

CarnivoraLionsPumaAnimalsEcosystemMovementhabitat selectionhuman-dominated landscapesintegrated step selection analysisPanthera leoPuma concolorspatio-temporal scaletemporal grain

Identifiers

PMID34668571
PMCPMC9298125
OpenAlexW3206360443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.