Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34668100›Full record

ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2022

Positive airway pressure therapy adherence for obstructive sleep apnea during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Chatkarin Tepwimonpetkun, Dittapol Muntham, Pijitra Suppasawatgul, Naricha Chirakalwasan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The impact of different CPAP delivery approaches on nightly adherence and discontinuation rate in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chatkarin TepwimonpetkunDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama IV Road, Pathum Wan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Dittapol MunthamExcellence Center for Sleep Disorders, Thai Red Cross Society, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pijitra SuppasawatgulFaculty of Communication Arts, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Naricha ChirakalwasanDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama IV Road, Pathum Wan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand. narichac@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0945-3757
Thai Red Cross Society · THChulalongkorn University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePositive airway pressure (PAP) adherence is a significant issue among patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, the data are limited regarding PAP adherence during the current COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted between February and October 2020 at the Excellence Center for Sleep Disorders, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. Patients with ongoing PAP-treated OSA were recruited. Data on PAP adherence before and during the COVID-19 pandemic were collected. Furthermore, pre-test and post-test questionnaires on knowledge on COVID-19, OSA, and PAP before and after tele-education were also evaluated.

resultsOf a total 156 patients, the majority had severe OSA (72%). By self-report, there was no significant difference in PAP usage in hours per day before compared to during the pandemic (p = 0.45), though in a subgroup with highest educational attainment (degree higher than bachelor's), PAP usage did increase during the pandemic (mean difference 0.23 ± 0.10; 95% CI 0.02-0.40, p = 0.03). However, objective PAP usage data demonstrated a trend towards increased usage comparing before and during the pandemic (4.64 ± 1.49 vs 5.12 ± 1.41; mean difference 0.48 ± 1.33; 95% CI 0.13-10.90, p = 0.12). Basic knowledge was significantly improved after tele-education (p < 0.001).

conclusionBy objective data, there was a trend towards increased PAP usage during the COVID-19 pandemic for the entire group. In a subgroup of patients with highest educational attainment, PAP adherence increased by self-report. Tele-education appeared to improve knowledge on COVID-19, OSA, and PAP usage.

Indexed as

COVID-19Sleep Apnea, ObstructiveContinuous Positive Airway PressureCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPandemicsPatient CompliancePolysomnographyThailandTreatment OutcomeCOVID-19Obstructive sleep apneaPositive airway pressure compliance

Identifiers

PMID34668100
PMCPMC8525851
OpenAlexW3207221599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.