Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34668078›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica2022

Mastication after craniotomy: pilot assessment of postoperative oral health-related quality of life.

Mortimer Gierthmuehlen, Nadja Jarc, Dennis T T Plachta, Claudia Schmoor, Christian Scheiwe, Petra Christine Gierthmuehlen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mortimer GierthmuehlenDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Freiburg, Medical Faculty, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Breisacher Strasse 64, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. mortimer.gierthmuehlen@ruhr-uni-bochum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8575-6445
Nadja JarcDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Freiburg, Medical Faculty, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Breisacher Strasse 64, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Dennis T T PlachtaNeuroloop GmbH, Engesser Str. 4, 79108, Freiburg, Germany.
Claudia SchmoorClinical Trials Unit, Medical Centre-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Christian ScheiweDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Freiburg, Medical Faculty, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Breisacher Strasse 64, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Petra Christine GierthmuehlenDepartment of Prosthodontics, University Medical Center Duesseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
University Medical Center Freiburg · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeurosurgical approaches to the brain often require the mobilization of the temporal muscle. Many patients complain of postoperative pain, atrophy, reduced mouth opening, and masticatory problems. Although the pterional, frontolateral-extended-pterional, and temporal craniotomies are the most frequently used approaches in neurosurgery, a systematic assessment of the postoperative oral health-related quality of life has never been performed so far. This study evaluates the oral health-related quality of life of patients after pterional, frontolateral-extended-pterional, or temporal craniotomy using a validated and standardized dental questionnaire, compares the results with the normal values of the general population, and investigates whether this questionnaire is sensitive to changes caused by surgical manipulation of the temporal muscle.

methodsThe "Oral Health Impact Profile" (OHIP14) is a validated questionnaire to assess the oral health-related quality of life. It asks the patients to assess their oral health situation within the past 7 days in 14 questions. Possible answers range from 0 (never) to 4 (very often). Sixty patients with benign intracranial processes operated through a lateral cranial approach were included. The questionnaire was answered before surgery (baseline) and 3 months and 15 months after surgery.

resultsOverall, postoperative OHIP scores increase significantly after 3 months and decrease after 15 months, but not to preoperative values. No factors can be identified which show a considerable relationship with the postoperative OHIP score.

conclusionsPostoperative impairment of mouth opening and pain during mastication can be observed 3 to 15 months after surgery and sometimes cause feedback from patients and their dentists. However, in line with existing literature, these complaints decrease with time. The study shows that the OHIP questionnaire is sensitive to changes caused by surgical manipulation of the temporal muscle and can therefore be used to investigate the influence of surgical techniques on postoperative complaints. Postoperatively, patients show worse OHIP scores than the general population, demonstrating that neurosurgical cranial approaches negatively influence the patient's oral health-related wellbeing. Larger studies using the OHIP questionnaire should evaluate if postoperative physical therapy, speech therapy, or specialized rehabilitation devices can improve the masticatory impairment after craniotomy.

trial registrationClinical trial register: DRKS00011096.

Indexed as

MasticationQuality of LifeCraniotomyHumansOral HealthSurveys and QuestionnairesAtrophyCraniotomyOHIPQoLQuality of lifeTemporal muscle

Identifiers

PMID34668078
PMCPMC9061666
OpenAlexW3207530182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.