Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34668050›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2022

A comparison of two different surgical procedures in the treatment of isolated spinal metastasis patients with metastatic spinal cord compression: a case-control study.

Shuang Cao, Xin Gao, Yue Zhang, Yifan Wang, Jing Wang, Tao Wang, Ying Liu, Shuming Hou, Jiahao Zhang, Yejin Zhou and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Quality of life in patients with malignant spinal cord compression: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Efficacy and safety of erythropoietin in isolated spinal metastasis patients with total en bloc spondylectomy surgery: a case-control study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shuang Cao *Department of Orthopedics, Third Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China.
Xin Gao *Department of Orthopedics, Orthopaedic Oncology Center, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, No. 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, Huangpu District, China.
Yue Zhang *Department of Orthopedics, Orthopaedic Oncology Center, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, No. 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, Huangpu District, China.
Yifan Wang *Department of Orthopedics, Third Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China.
Jing WangDepartment of Orthopedics, Orthopaedic Oncology Center, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, No. 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, Huangpu District, China.
Tao WangDepartment of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China.
Ying LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, Third Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China.
Shuming HouDepartment of Orthopedics, Orthopaedic Oncology Center, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, No. 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, Huangpu District, China.
Jiahao ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, Orthopaedic Oncology Center, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, No. 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, Huangpu District, China. zhangjhacx@sina.com.
Yejin ZhouDepartment of Orthopedics, Third Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China. zhouyejin@126.com.
Tielong LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, Orthopaedic Oncology Center, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, No. 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, Huangpu District, China. liutielongvip@163.com.
Second Military Medical University · CNAnhui Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of the study was to compare total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) and separation surgery with postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS) for isolated metastatic patients with spinal cord compression by assessing recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), postoperative complications, and quality of life scores (QoL).

methodsFrom October 2013 to December 2020, 52 isolated spinal metastasis patients with cord compression were selected and separated into two groups based on the surgical method used (TES group, n = 26; and SSRS group, n = 26). Indexes for evaluation included postoperative Frankel grade, postoperative ECOG-PS, RFS, OS, postoperative complications, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and QoL.

resultsThe average follow-up duration was 31.44 months. There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in postoperative complications and OS between the two groups. However, a significant difference in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative ECOG-PS, RFS, and mental health domain (6 months after surgery) was found between the two groups (P < 0.05). According to The Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire assessment, the total pain and physical function domains scores were also elevated after surgery in both groups. However, no significant difference was observed between groups A and B (p = 0.450 and 0.446, respectively).

conclusionsTES and SSRS were efficient methods for treating solitary spinal metastasis patients with metastatic spinal cord compression. Better local tumor control and mental health were found in the TES group, and most patients felt as if they were free of spinal tumors. Compared with TES, the SSRS caused less operation-related trauma. However, there was no significant difference in OS between the two groups.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord CompressionSpinal NeoplasmsBlood Loss, SurgicalCase-Control StudiesHumansPostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeIsolated spinal metastasisMetastatic spinal cord compressionSeparation surgeryStereotactic radiosurgeryTotal en bloc spondylectomy

Identifiers

PMID34668050
OpenAlexW3205778739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.