ArticleArchives of microbiology2021
Correlation between type IIIA CRISPR-Cas system and SCCmec in Staphylococcus epidermidis.
Article in Archives of microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The pathogenicity and virulence of the opportunistic pathogenVirulence · 2024Review
- The Spread of Antibiotic Resistance Genes In Vivo Model.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A subculture of S.epidermidis strain ATCC35984 that is amenable to genetically manipulate was occasionally found in our laboratory. This mutant exhibited susceptibility to methicillin in contrast to its parent strain. To unveil the underlying mechanism, whole-genome sequencing of the mutant was performed. A comparative analysis revealed that a large DNA fragment encompassing the CRISPR-Cas system, type I R-M system and the SCCmec element was deleted from the mutant. The large chromosomal deletion associated with CRISPR-Cas system was also observed to occur spontaneously in S. epidermidis in another independent laboratory, or artificially induced by introducing engineering crRNAs in other bacterial species. These findings imply the CRISPR-Cas systems can affect bacterial genome remodeling through deletion of the integrated MGEs (mobile genetic elements). Further bioinformatics analysis identified a higher carriage rate of SCCmec element in the S. epidermidis strains harboring the CRISPR-Cas system. MLST typing and phylogenetic analysis of those CRIPSR-Cas-positive S. epidermidis strains revealed multiple origins. In addition, distinct types of SCCmec carried in those strains suggested that acquisition of this MGE originated from multiple independent recombination events. Intriguingly, CRISPR-Cas systems are found to be always located in the vicinity of orfX gene among staphylococci. Allelic analysis of CRISPR loci flanking cas genes disclosed that the loci distal to the orfX gene are considerably stable and conserved, which probably serve as recombination hotspot between CRISPR-Cas system and phage or plasmid. Therefore, the findings generally support the notion that incomplete immune protection of CRISPR-Cas system can promote dissemination of its neighboring SCCmec element.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.