Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34668018›Full record

ReviewInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2021

A novel conceptual approach to lean: value, psychological conditions for engagement with work and perceived organizational support in hospital care.

Latif Al-Hakim, Nick Sevdalis

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Operational inefficiency and perceived quality in a paediatric day hospital: a lean-informed study of patient flow, caregiver and staff perceptions.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Latif Al-HakimSchool of Business, University of Southern Queensland, West Street, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia.
Nick SevdalisCentre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7560-8924
King's College London · GBUniversity of Southern Queensland · AU

Funding

King's Health Partners n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLean thinking (LT) has emerged as a promising approach for reducing waste and improving efficiency. However, its applicability to and effectiveness within healthcare, particularly within hospital-based care, remains clouded by uncertainty. This paper attempts to answer the question 'how lean thinking can best be applied to hospital-based care'.

methodsNarrative review and conceptual synthesis.

resultsWe first review the principles of LT and how some of them are challenging to apply within hospital-based care. We then highlight that lean is an approach that was always meant as a combination of technical expertise and a focus on people-supported by a suite of human resource management supportive practices. We proceed to introduce evidence stemming from the literature studies on perceived organizational support and the psychological conditions for successful staff engagement with their work (namely, psychological meaningfulness, availability and safety as experienced by staff) and review how they may apply to hospital-based health workers. We finally advance a set of hypotheses regarding how different facets of value in a hospital care pathway may be correlated and these relationships mediated/moderated by perceived organizational support and the psychological conditions for engagement with work.

conclusionWe conclude with a discussion of the limitations of our work and the aspiration that the conceptual analysis we have offered is a useful and actionable framework for hospital management to explore how best to support their staff-in a manner that ultimately achieves better quality and patient experience of care.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHospitalsEfficiency, OrganizationalHumansPersonnel, Hospitalhuman resource managementleadershipleanperceived organizational supportpsychological meaningfulness

Identifiers

PMID34668018
PMCPMC8897978
OpenAlexW3205715204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.