Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34667919›Full record

ArticlePain reports

Safety and efficacy of remote electrical neuromodulation for the acute treatment of chronic migraine: an open-label study.

Brian Grosberg, Liron Rabany, Tamar Lin, Dagan Harris, Maya Vizel, Alon Ironi, Christopher P O'Carroll, Jack Schim

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04194008 nacompletednot on this map

An Open Label, Single Arm, Multicenter Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Nerivio, a Remote Electrical Neuromodulation Device, for Acute Treatment of Migraine in People With Chronic Migraine

TypeinterventionalSponsorTheranicaRan2019 to 2020Enrolled126ConditionsChronic MigraineArmsNerivio
NCT05443659 completednot on this map

Real-World Analysis of Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) for the Acute Treatment of Migraine in Adolescence

TypeobservationalSponsorTheranicaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled1,629ConditionsMigraine in AdolescenceArmsNerivio
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Non-Invasive Neuromodulation in the Treatment of Headache.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Neuromodulation for Headache Management in Pregnancy.Current pain and headache reports · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Digital therapeutics in the clinic.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brian GrosbergHartford Healthcare Headache Center, Hartford, CT, USA.
Liron RabanyTheranica Bio-Electronics, Netanya, Israel.
Tamar LinTheranica Bio-Electronics, Netanya, Israel.
Dagan HarrisTheranica Bio-Electronics, Netanya, Israel.
Maya VizelTheranica Bio-Electronics, Netanya, Israel.
Alon IroniTheranica Bio-Electronics, Netanya, Israel.
Christopher P O'CarrollHoag Neuroscience Institute, Newport Beach, CA, USA.
Jack SchimThe Neurology Center of Southern California, Carlsbad, CA, USA.
Hartford Hospital · USHoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian · USNeurology Center of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRemote electrical neuromodulation (REN) is an acute treatment of migraine. The results from several studies in patients with episodic migraine suggest that REN is an effective and safe acute treatment of migraine. A recent pilot study provided initial support that REN is effective in patients with chronic migraine as well.

objectivesThe current study aimed to validate and provide further evidence for the safety and efficacy of REN in a large sample of patients impacted by chronic migraine.

methodsIn this open-label, single-arm study, patients with chronic migraine treated their headaches with the REN device (Nerivio, Theranica Bio-Electronics Ltd, Israel) for 4 weeks. Participants used an electronic diary to record their symptoms at treatment initiation, 2 hours after treatment, and 24 hours after treatment. The primary end point was the percentage of subjects who achieved pain relief at 2 hours posttreatment. Secondary end points included pain freedom and improvement of associated symptoms and functional disability.

resultsOne hundred twenty-six subjects were enrolled into the study, of which 91 subjects had an evaluable treatment with REN. Pain relief and pain disappearance at 2 hours were achieved by 59.3% (54/91) and 20.9% (19/91) of modified intent-to-treat subjects, respectively (with worst-case sensitivity analysis indicating 54.5% and 19.2%, respectively). Sustained pain relief at 24 hours was observed in 64.4% (29/45) of those who achieved pain relief at 2 hours (with worst-case sensitivity analysis indicating 45.6%). The findings of the study show that REN has a favorable effect on nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia and improves functional ability. One device-related adverse event was reported.

conclusionsRemote electrical neuromodulation treatments results in the relief of migraine headaches and associated symptoms, thus offering a drug-free acute treatment option for people with chronic migraine.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04194008.

Indexed as

Conditioned pain modulationMedication overuse headacheNerivioNonpharmacologicalREN

Identifiers

PMID34667919
PMCPMC8519197
OpenAlexW3205052126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.