ArticleLearning health systems2021
Assessing the utility and accuracy of ICD10-CM non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage codes for intracranial aneurysm research.
Article in Learning health systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emergency Department Triage Accuracy and Delays in Care for High-Risk Conditions.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Development and external validation of the SMABMJ open · 2025Article
- Prescribed Drug Use and Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Incidence: A Drug-Wide Association Study.Neurology · 2024Article
- Assessing the utility and accuracy of ICD10-CM non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage codes for intracranial aneurysm research.Learning health systems · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe 10th revision of International Classification of Disease, Clinical Modification (ICD10-CM) increased the number of codes to identify non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage from 1 to 22. ICD10-CM codes are able to specify the location of aneurysms causing subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH); however, it is not clear how frequently or accurately these codes are being used in practice.
objectiveTo systematically evaluate the usage and accuracy of location-specific ICD10-CM codes for aSAH.
methodsWe extracted all uses of ICD10-CM codes for non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (I60.x) during the first 3 years following the implementation of ICD10-CM from the billing module of the electronic health record (EHR) for UCHealth. For those codes that specified aSAH location (I60.0-I60.6), EHR documentation was reviewed to determine whether there was an active aSAH, any patient history of aSAH, or unruptured intracranial aneurysm/s and the locations of those outcomes.
resultsBetween 1 October 2015 and 30 September 2018, there were 3119 instances of non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage ICD10-CM codes (I60.00-I60.9), of which 297 (9.5%) code instances identified aSAH location (I60.0-I60.6). The usage of location-specific codes increased from 5.7% in 2015 to 11.2% in 2018. These codes accurately identified current aSAH (64%), any patient history of aSAH (84%), and any patient history of intracranial aneurysm (87%). The accuracy of identified outcome location was 53% in current aSAH, 72% for any history of aSAH, and 76% for any history of an intracranial aneurysm.
conclusionsResearchers should use ICD10-CM codes with caution when attempting to detect active aSAH and/or aneurysm location.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.