ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2021
Normative data for ages 18-45 for ocular motor and vestibular testing using eye tracking.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Portable eye-tracking as a reliable assessment of oculomotor, cognitive and reaction time function: Normative data for 18-45 year old.PloS one · 2021Trial
- Oculomotor, vestibular, reaction time, and cognitive (OVRT-C) responses in 7- to 17-year-old children.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- Age-Based Developmental Biomarkers in Eye Movements: A Retrospective Analysis Using Machine Learning.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Exercise Intolerance After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Occurs in All Subtypes in the Adult Population.Journal of neurotrauma · 2024Article
- Article
- Longitudinal Outcomes of Cumulative Impact Exposure on Oculomotor Functioning in Professional Motorsport Drivers.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Smartphone video nystagmography using convolutional neural networks: ConVNG.Journal of neurology · 2023Article
- Virtual reality-based interventions for the rehabilitation of vestibular and balance impairments post-concussion: a scoping review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Comparison of Asymmetry between Perceptual, Ocular, and Postural Vestibular Screening Tests.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Oculomotor, vestibular, reaction time, and cognitive tests as objective measures of neural deficits in patients post COVID-19 infection.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Normative data for ages 18-45 for ocular motor and vestibular testing using eye tracking.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2021Article
- Effect of age on virtual reality-assisted subjective visual vertical and subjective visual horizontal at different head-tilt angles.Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngologyArticle
- Objective oculomotor, vestibular, reaction time, and cognitive signatures of vestibular migraine.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveEye tracking technology has been employed in assessing ocular motor and vestibular function following vestibular and neurologic conditions, including traumatic brain injury (TBI). Assessments include tests that provide visual and motion (rotation) stimuli while recording horizontal, vertical, and torsional eye movements. While some of these tests have shown diagnostic promise in previous studies, their use in clinical practice is limited by the lack of normative data. The goal of this study was to construct normative reference ranges to be used when comparing patients' results.
methodsOptokinetic response, subjective visual horizontal and vertical, and rotation tests were administered to male and female volunteers, ages 18-45, who were free from neurological, vestibular disorders, or other head injuries. Tests were administered using either a rotatory chair or a portable virtual reality-like goggle equipped with video-oculography.
resultsReference values for eye movements in response to different patterns of stimuli were analyzed from 290 to 449 participants. Analysis of gender (self-reported) or age when grouped as pediatric (late adolescent; 18-21 years of age) and adult (21-45 years of age) revealed no effects on the test metrics. Data were pooled and presented for each test metric as the 95% reference interval (RI) with 90% confidence intervals (CI) on upper and lower limits of the RI.
conclusionsThis normative database can serve as a tool to aid in diagnosis, treatment, and/or rehabilitation protocols for vestibular and neurological conditions, including mild TBI (mTBI). This database has been cleared by the FDA for use in clinical practice (K192186). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.