Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34667730›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2021

Efficacy and safety of newly developed preservative-free latanoprost 0.005% eye drops versus preserved latanoprost 0.005% in open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension: 12-week results of a randomized, multicenter, controlled phase III trial.

Joon Mo Kim, Kyung Rim Sung, Ji Woong Lee, Haksu Kyung, Seungsoo Rho, Chan Yun Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Joon Mo KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 03181, Republic of Korea.
Kyung Rim SungDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul Asan Medical Center, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea.
Ji Woong LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University Medical School, Busan 49241, Republic of Korea.
Haksu KyungDepartment of Ophthalmology, National Medical Center, Seoul 04564, Republic of Korea.
Seungsoo RhoDepartment of Ophthalmology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam 13496, Republic of Korea.
Chan Yun KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
Yonsei University · KRCHA University Bundang Medical Center · KRNational Medical Center · KRPusan National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the therapeutic efficacy, safety and tolerability of newly developed preservative-free (PF) latanoprost generic [TJO-002] and compare it with benzalkonium chloride (BAK)-preserved latanoprost [Xalatan

methodsIncluded patients were aged ≥19y with POAG/OHT. After a washout period, patients with IOP 21-35 mm Hg at 9

resultsBoth groups showed a statistically significant decrease of average diurnal IOP at 12wk compared to baseline (-7.21±3.10 mm Hg in the PF latanoprost group and -7.02±3.17 mm Hg in the BAK latanoprost group, both

conclusionPF latanoprost has at least similar efficacy in terms of IOP reduction and better tolerability compared with BAK latanoprost.

Indexed as

benzalkonium chlorideintraocular pressurelatanoprostpreservative-free

Identifiers

PMID34667730
PMCPMC8482002
OpenAlexW3202001224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.