Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34667649›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2021

Choosing patient-reported outcome measures for shoulder pathology.

Roberto Padua, Laura de Girolamo, Alberto Grassi, Davide Cucchi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05822414 (Erector Spinae Plane Block vs. Superior Trunk Block for Postoperative Pain Control After Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05822414 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Erector Spinae Plane Block vs. Superior Trunk Block for Postoperative Pain Control After Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Taiwan University HospitalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsRotator Cuff InjuriesArmsErector spinae plane block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Trends in reported outcomes and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in humeral shaft fracture literature: a systematic review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cutting Through Time: A Surgical Comparison of Bosworth, LARS™, and TightRopeJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Roberto PaduaOrthopedics Working Group on Evidence Based Medicine, GLOBE, Rome, Italy.
Laura de GirolamoOrthopaedics Biotechnology Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milano, Italy.
Alberto GrassiIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Davide CucchiDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6284-7977

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was designed to identify the most frequent shoulder patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) reported in high-quality literature.A systematic review was performed to identify shoulder PROMs, and their diffusion within the scientific literature was tested with a subsequent dedicated search in MEDLINE.506 studies were included in the final data analysis, for a total number of 36,553 patients.The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH), the American Shoulder, Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES) and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) were the most frequently reported PROMs in the analysed publications, with disease-specific PROMs being used with increasing frequency.A core set of outcome measures for future studies on patients with shoulder pathologies, based on the international acceptance and diffusion of each PROM, is needed.A combination of the DASH score for shoulder outcome assessment with more specific PROMs, such as the ASES for rotator cuff pathology and osteoarthritis and the SPADI for shoulder stiffness and shoulder pain of unspecified origin, is proposed as a recommended set of PROMs. Cite this article:

Indexed as

outcome measurespatient-reportedshoulder

Identifiers

PMID34667649
PMCPMC8489482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.