Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34667346›Full record

ArticleAnesthesia, essays and researches

Examination of Spinal Canal Anatomy with MRI Measurements in Lomber Disc Herniation Patients: An Anesthesiologist Viewpoint.

Ayhan Kaydu, İbrahim Andan, Muhammed Akif Deniz, Hüseyin Bilge, Ömer Başol

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesia, essays and researches. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ayhan KayduDepartment of Anesthesiology, Dicle University Faculty of Medicine, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
İbrahim AndanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Dicle University Faculty of Medicine, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
Muhammed Akif DenizDepartment of Radiology, Dicle University Faculty of Medicine, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
Hüseyin BilgeDepartment of General Surgery, Dicle University Faculty of Medicine, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
Ömer BaşolDepartment of General Surgery, Dicle University Faculty of Medicine, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
Dicle University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimThe aim of this study is to investigate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) to identify the challenges associated with neuraxial anesthesia. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe MRI images in the supine position of 203 patients admitted to hospital with complaints of lower back pain were studied. Medial sagittal slices of the lumbar spine were imaged from L1 to S1. LDH is classified as either bulging, extrusion, or protrusion.

resultsFor this study, 83 males and 120 females with a mean age of 43.18 ± 14.68 years were recruited. The highest herniation level was observed at L4-L5 in 145 (71.4%) patients: 76 instances of disc bulging (37.4%), 56 instances of extrusion (27.6%), and 13 instances of protrusion (6.4%). The longest distance between the skin and spinal cord was 60.06 ± 1.61 mm at L5-S1; the longest distance at width of the epidural space was 6.09 ± 1.95 mm at L3-L4. According to the disc herniation groups, no significant differences were found between the skin-to-dura distance, width of the epidural space, and depth of skin level to spinous process (

conclusionsLumbar disc pathologies can cause anatomical derangements in the spinal canal, which may cause neurologic deficits by neuraxial blockade.

Indexed as

Epidural spacelumbar disc herniationmagnetic resonance imagingneuraxial anesthesianeurological deficit

Identifiers

PMID34667346
PMCPMC8462407
OpenAlexW3196442080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.