Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34667259›Full record

ReviewMolecular psychiatry2022

An assessment of the existence of adult neurogenesis in humans and value of its rodent models for neuropsychiatric diseases.

Alvaro Duque, Jon I Arellano, Pasko Rakic

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Insulin resistance: fueling oxidative stress and neurodegeneration.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2025
    Review
  9. Reduced Adult Neurogenesis in Humans Results From a Tradeoff Rather Than Direct Negative Selection.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Hallmarks of Brain Plasticity.Biomedicines · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alvaro DuqueDepartment of Neuroscience, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Jon I ArellanoDepartment of Neuroscience, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Pasko RakicDepartment of Neuroscience, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. pasko.rakic@yale.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6963-0508
Yale University · US

Funding

Origin of Cortical Species-specific Distinctions.R01DA023999 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI RAKIC, PASKO · 2008 to 2019
$7.9M
Origin of Cortical Species-specific DistinctionsR37DA023999 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI PASKO RAKIC · 2020 to 2026
$5.6M
Yale Macaque Brain ResourceR01MH113257 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Alvaro Duque · 2017 to 2026
$4.3M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA023999NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA023999NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH113257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In sub-mammalian vertebrates like fishes, amphibians, and reptiles, new neurons are produced during the entire lifespan. This capacity diminishes considerably in birds and even more in mammals where it persists only in the olfactory system and hippocampal dentate gyrus. Adult neurogenesis declines even more drastically in nonhuman primates and recent evidence shows that this is basically extinct in humans. Why should such seemingly useful capacity diminish during primate evolution? It has been proposed that this occurs because of the need to retain acquired complex knowledge in stable populations of neurons and their synaptic connections during many decades of human life. In this review, we will assess critically the claim of significant adult neurogenesis in humans and show how current evidence strongly indicates that humans lack this trait. In addition, we will discuss the allegation of many rodent studies that adult neurogenesis is involved in psychiatric diseases and that it is a potential mechanism for human neuron replacement and regeneration. We argue that these reports, which usually neglect significant structural and functional species-specific differences, mislead the general population into believing that there might be a cure for a variety of neuropsychiatric diseases as well as stroke and brain trauma by genesis of new neurons and their incorporation into existing synaptic circuitry.

Indexed as

PrimatesRodentiaAnimalsHippocampusHumansNeurogenesisNeuronsSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID34667259
PMCPMC8967762
OpenAlexW3205073971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.