Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34667014›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Gender differences in snowboarding accidents in Austria: a 2005-2018 registry analysis.

Christopher Duane Rugg, Till Malzacher, Julia Ausserer, Andrea Rederlechner, Peter Paal, Mathias Ströhle

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03755050 (A 13-years Nationwide Retrospective Observational Study of Alpine Accidents in Austria - Sleighing, Skiing, Snowboarding, Snowshoeing, Climbing, Hiking, Cycling, Mountain Biking, Canyoning and Alpine Watersport Activities), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03755050 unknown statusnot on this map

A 13-years Nationwide Retrospective Observational Study of Alpine Accidents in Austria - Sleighing, Skiing, Snowboarding, Snowshoeing, Climbing, Hiking, Cycling, Mountain Biking, Canyoning and Alpine Watersport Activities

TypeobservationalSponsorMedical University InnsbruckRan2018 to 2022Enrolled20,000ConditionsAlpine Accident, Sleighing, Climbing, CyclingArmsgeneral and specific data
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher Duane RuggDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7150-7357
Till MalzacherDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Julia AussererDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Andrea RederlechnerDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Peter PaalDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Mathias StröhleDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria mathias.stroehle@tirol-kliniken.at.ORCID 0000-0002-6623-7823
Innsbruck Medical University · ATParacelsus Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo elucidate gender differences in snowboarding accidents.

designRetrospective registry analysis within the Austrian National Registry of Mountain Accidents.

settingSnowboard-related emergencies between November 2005 and October 2018.

participantsAll injured snowboarders with documented injury severity and gender (3536 men; 2155 women). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Gender-specific analysis of emergency characteristics and injury patterns.

resultsOver time, the number of mild, severe and fatal injuries per season decreased in men but not in women. Accidents most frequently were interindividual collisions (>80%) and occurred when heading downhill on a slope. Men more often suffered injuries to the shoulder (15.1% vs 9.2%) and chest (6.8% vs 4.4%), were involved in accidents caused by falling (12.9% vs 9.6%) or obstacle impact (4.3% vs 1.5%), while on slopes with higher difficulty levels (red: 42.6% vs 39.9%; black: 4.2% vs 2.5%), while snowboarding in a park (4.8% vs 2.1%) and under the influence of alcohol (1.6% vs 0.5%). Women more often sustained injuries to the back (10.2% vs 13.1%) and pelvis (2.9% vs 4.2%), on easier slopes (blue: 46.1% vs 52.4%) and while standing or sitting (11.0% vs 15.8%). Mild injuries were more frequent in women (48.6% vs 56.4%), severe and fatal injuries in men (36.0% vs 29.7% and 0.9% vs 0.4%). Male gender, age and the use of a helmet were risk factors for the combined outcome of severe or fatal injuries (OR (99% CI): 1.22 (1.00 to 1.48), 1.02 (1.02 to 1.03) and 1.31 (1.05 to 1.63)). When wearing a helmet, the relative risk (RR) for severe injuries increased while that for mild injuries decreased in male snowboarders only (RR (95% CI): 1.21 (1.09 to 1.34) and 0.88 (0.83 to 0.95)).

conclusionsSnowboard injuries are proportionally increasing in women and the observed injury patterns and emergency characteristics differ substantially from those of men. Further gender-specific research in snowboard-related injuries should be encouraged. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03755050.

Indexed as

Athletic InjuriesSkiingAccidentsAustriaFemaleHumansMaleRegistriesRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSex Factorsaccident & emergency medicineepidemiologyorthopaedic sports traumasports medicine

Identifiers

PMID34667014
PMCPMC8527139
OpenAlexW3206409136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.