Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34667002›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Protocol to test the efficacy and safety of frequent applications of skin electrical stimulation for Leber hereditary optic neuropathy: a single-arm, open-label, non-randomised prospective study.

Kaori Ueda, Takuji Kurimoto, Fumio Takano, Yusuke Murai, Sotaro Mori, Mari Sakamoto, Takayuki Nagai, Yuko Yamada-Nakanishi, Makoto Nakamura

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 90% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kaori UedaDivision of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6100-349X
Takuji KurimotoDivision of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan kuritaku12011201@yahoo.co.jp.
Fumio TakanoDivision of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Yusuke MuraiDivision of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Sotaro MoriDivision of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Mari SakamotoDivision of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Takayuki NagaiDivision of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Yuko Yamada-NakanishiDivision of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Makoto NakamuraDivision of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6464-4302
Kobe University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLeber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) is an acute or subacute inherited optic neuropathy caused by mitochondrial mutations. More than 90% of patients with LHON have one of three point mutations (ie, G3460A, G11778A and T14484C). We previously reported that a 12-week session of skin electrical stimulation (SES) with a 2-week interval significantly improved visual acuity and field tests 1 week after the last stimulation and without adverse effects in 10 cases of LHON carrying the mt DNA G11778A mutation. In the present study, we will examine the magnitude and persistence of the efficacy and presence or absence of adverse events using SES with a more frequent stimulation protocol. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will be a single-arm, open-labelled, non-randomised clinical study that analyses 15 cases of LHON with G11778A mutation. All participants will take a portable SES device home and perform SES by themselves every other day for 12 weeks. The logarithm for the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 1 week after the last SES will be measured as the primary outcome. LogMAR BCVA will be measured at four and 8 weeks after the last SES treatment. The Humphrey visual field sensitivity test using size V stimulation and critical fusion frequency at 1, 4 and 8 weeks after the last SES session will be secondary outcome measurements. Slit-lamp examination, optical coherence tomography and specular microscopy will also be performed to verify the safety of SES. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Kobe University, Japan (Approval No.C190030). This study is in progress and deserves Pre-result. All documents communicating with the ethics committee will be reposited by the researcher. Modifications to the protocol will be reviewed by the ethics committee and implemented after approval. Data monitoring will be performed by a researcher who is not involved in the study every 6 months after approval. The research summary results will be registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs) and made available to participants in accordance with the terms described in the documents. In addition, the results of this study will be presented at domestic and international meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals within a year after data is fixed. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCTs052200033.

Indexed as

Optic Atrophy, Hereditary, LeberDNA, MitochondrialElectric StimulationHumansMutationNon-Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicProspective StudiesVisual Field TestsDNA, Mitochondrialclinical trialsneurogeneticsneuro-ophthalmology

Identifiers

PMID34667002
PMCPMC8527142
OpenAlexW3206398480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.