Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34667000›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Perceived effect of financial risk protection by the Urban-Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance Scheme: a mixed-methods study of rural residents in China.

Huan Jiang, Miaomiao Zhao, Guomei Tian, Zihua Zhao, Ding Ding, Mei Yin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Huan Jiang *Humanities and Social Sciences College, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Miaomiao Zhao *Department of health management, Shcool of public health, Nantong university, Nantong, Jiangsu,China.
Guomei TianFourth affiliate hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang,China.
Zihua ZhaoScientific Research Department, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Ding DingDepartment of Social Medicine, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Mei YinHumanities and Social Sciences College, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China yinmeihmu@163.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6393-2065
Harbin Medical University · CNDalian Medical University · CNNantong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIt is to explore the perceived financial risk protection effect of the Urban-Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance Scheme (URRBMI) and its influencing factors to provide evidence to further improve the URRBMI.

designIt is a cross-sectional survey.

participantsThis mixed-methods study is conducted in five provinces in rural China. Through stratified cluster random sampling, 1681 rural residents participate in a cross-sectional questionnaire survey (1657 valid questionnaires are retrieved). Thirty rural residents participate in in-depth interviews. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: A multivariate logistic regression analysis is adopted to identify factors influencing respondents' perceptions. Semistructured interviews are used to identify the reasons why some respondents believed the URRBMI to be ineffective.

resultsOverall, 77.5% of respondents believe that the URRBMI is effective. Respondents, who are older, have a higher household income, prefer primary health facilities and provide a higher rating for critical illness compensation and maximum compensatory payouts. They are more likely to give the URRBMI a higher effectiveness rating than their counterparts. Qualitatively, participants who believe the URRBMI to be ineffective list the following reasons: low outpatient service coverage, insufficient or undersupplied drugs and services in the insurance list, problems in the arrangement of deductibles and maximum compensatory payouts, provider-induced behaviour and increased healthcare service price.

conclusionsThis exploration focuses on the reasons why rural residents think the scheme is invalid, which are vital for policy reform. Policies should focus on benefits design and coverage, the assumption of a supervisory role, avoiding financial risk stemming from critical illness and cross-sectoral actions to strengthen the primary healthcare system and comprehensive social security wealth.

Indexed as

InsuranceRural PopulationAmbulatory CareChinaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansInsurance, Healthhealth policyqualitative researchquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID34667000
PMCPMC8527163
OpenAlexW3205550035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.