ArticleBMJ global health2021
Systematic analysis of authorship demographics in global surgery.
Article in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Catalysing global surgery: a meta-research study on factors affecting surgical research collaborations with Africa.Systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Identifying critical gaps in research to advance global surgery by 2030: a systematic mapping review.BMC health services research · 2023Pooled it
- Variations in Author Gender in Obstetrics Disease Prevalence Literature: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Authorship representation in global emergency medicine: a bibliometric analysis from 2016 to 2020.BMJ global health · 2022Pooled it
- Musculoskeletal injury research in sub-Saharan Africa : a ten-year bibliometric analysis of research outputs from Malawi, South Africa, and Tanzania.Bone & joint open · 2026Article
- Assessing National Health Research System in a resource-limited setting: Insights from Indonesia.PloS one · 2026Article
- Global Surgery as an emerging discipline: Why it thrives despite barriers-And what must happen next.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Global surgery research: defend or denounce? Focus on the ethics of research in low- and middle-income countries.The British journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Global Authorship Representation in Otolaryngology Clinical Trials.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025Article
- A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Speaker Representation: Intentionality meets Intersectionality in Academic Global Surgery.Annals of global health · 2025Article
- Rewriting the byline: toward epistemic justice in global health authorship.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Examining the surgical backlog due to COVID-19 in Latin America and the Caribbean: insights from a scoping review.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2024Article
- A review of authorship in herpes simplex virus type-2 (HSV-2) research conducted in low-income and middle-income countries between 2000 and 2020.BMJ global health · 2024Review
- Developing and transferring a children's surgical training program from India to Africa a south-to-south global initiative.Pediatric surgery international · 2024Article
- Thoracic aortic surgery in low- and middle-income countries: Time to bridge the gap?JTCVS open · 2024Article
- Colonisation and its aftermath: reimagining global surgery.BMJ global health · 2024Review
- Beyond the Ivory Tower: Perception of academic global surgery by surgeons in low- and middle-income countries.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Gender Trends in First Authorship of Academic Publications Related to Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome.Cureus · 2023Review
- Race/Ethnicity and Gender Representation in Hematology and Oncology Editorial Boards: What is the State of Diversity?The oncologist · 2023Article
- Gender and racial differences in first and senior authorship of high-impact critical care randomized controlled trial studies from 2000 to 2022.Annals of intensive care · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
62 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlobal surgery has recently gained prominence as an academic discipline within global health. Authorship inequity has been a consistent feature of global health publications, with over-representation of authors from high-income countries (HICs), and disenfranchisement of researchers from low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). In this study, we investigated authorship demographics within recently published global surgery literature.
methodsWe performed a systematic analysis of author characteristics, including gender, seniority and institutional affiliation, for global surgery studies published between 2016 and 2020 and indexed in the PubMed database. We compared the distribution of author gender and seniority across studies related to different topics; between authors affiliated with HICs and LMICs; and across studies with different authorship networks.
results1240 articles were included for analysis. Most authors were male (60%), affiliated only with HICs (51%) and of high seniority (55% were fully qualified specialist or generalist clinicians, Principal Investigators, or in senior leadership or management roles). The proportion of male authors increased with increasing seniority for last and middle authors. Studies related to Obstetrics and Gynaecology had similar numbers of male and female authors, whereas there were more male authors in studies related to surgery (69% male) and Anaesthesia and Critical care (65% male). Compared with HIC authors, LMIC authors had a lower proportion of female authors at every seniority grade. This gender gap among LMIC middle authors was reduced in studies where all authors were affiliated only with LMICs.
conclusionAuthorship disparities are evident within global surgery academia. Remedial actions to address the lack of authorship opportunities for LMIC authors and female authors are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.