Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34666900›Full record

ArticleMedicina clinica2022

Commercialized kits to assess T-cell responses against SARS-CoV-2 S peptides. A pilot study in health care workers.

Mónica Martínez-Gallo, Juliana Esperalba, Ricardo Pujol-Borrell, Víctor Sandá, Iria Arrese-Muñoz, Candela Fernández-Naval, Andrés Antón, Victoria Cardona, Moisés Labrador-Horrillo, Tomás Pumarola and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicina clinica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Accuracy of QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 research use only assay and characterization of the CD4International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. T-cell proliferation assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cells.Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mónica Martínez-GalloImmunology Division, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron (HUVH), Jeffrey Model Foundation Excellence Center, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Diagnostic Immunology research group Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Juliana EsperalbaMicrobiology Division, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron (HUVH), Departament de Genètica i Microbiologia, Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Ricardo Pujol-BorrellImmunology Division, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron (HUVH), Jeffrey Model Foundation Excellence Center, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Diagnostic Immunology research group Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Víctor SandáImmunology Division, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron (HUVH), Jeffrey Model Foundation Excellence Center, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Iria Arrese-MuñozImmunology Division, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron (HUVH), Jeffrey Model Foundation Excellence Center, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Candela Fernández-NavalMicrobiology Department, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
Andrés AntónMicrobiology Division, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron (HUVH), Departament de Genètica i Microbiologia, Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Victoria CardonaAllergy Section, Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron (HUVH), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; ARADyAL Research Network, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Spain; Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain.
Moisés Labrador-HorrilloUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain; Allergy Section, Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron (HUVH), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; ARADyAL Research Network, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Spain; Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address: mlabrador@vhebron.net.
Tomás PumarolaMicrobiology Division, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron (HUVH), Departament de Genètica i Microbiologia, Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Manuel Hernandéz-GonzálezImmunology Division, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron (HUVH), Jeffrey Model Foundation Excellence Center, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Diagnostic Immunology research group Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is crucial to assess the levels of protection generated by natural infection or SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, mainly in individuals professionally exposed and in vulnerable groups. Measuring T-cell responses may complement antibody tests currently in use as correlates of protection. Our aim was to assess the feasibility of a validated assay of T-cell responses.

methodsTwenty health-care-workers (HCW) were included. Antibody test to SARS-CoV-2 N and S-proteins in parallel with a commercially available whole-blood-interferon-gamma-release-assay (IGRA) to S-peptides and two detection methods, CLIA and ELISA were determined.

resultsIGRA test detected T-cell responses in naturally exposed and vaccinated HCW already after first vaccination dose. The correlation by the two detection methods was very high (R>0.8) and sensitivity and specificity ranged between 100 and 86% and 100-73% respectively. Even though there was a very high concordance between specific antibody levels and the IGRA assay in the ability to detect immune response to SARS-CoV-2, there was a relatively low quantitative correlation. In the small group primed by natural infection, one vaccine dose was sufficient to reach immune response plateau. IGRA was positive in one, with Ig(S) antibody negative vaccinated immunosuppressed HCW illustrating another advantage of the IGRA-test.

conclusionWhole-blood-IGRA-tests amenable to automation and constitutes a promising additional tool for measuring the state of the immune response to SARS-CoV-2; they are applicable to large number of samples and may become a valuable correlate of protection to COVID-19, particularly for vulnerable groups at risk of being re-exposed to infection, as are health-care-workers.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Antibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesHealth PersonnelHumansPeptidesPilot ProjectsT-LymphocytesAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesPeptidesBNT162b2-mRNA-COVID-19-vaccineCell mediated immunityEnsayos de liberación Interferon-gammaInmunidad Mediada por CélulasInterferon-gamma-release-assaysSARS-CoV-2Vacuna BNT162b2-mRNA-COVID-19

Identifiers

PMID34666900
PMCPMC8463390
OpenAlexW3204115890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.