Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34666840›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2021

An implementation intervention to increase the routine provision of antenatal care addressing gestational weight gain: study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster trial.

Melanie Kingsland, Jenna Hollis, Eva Farragher, Luke Wolfenden, Karen Campbell, Craig Pennell, Penny Reeves, Belinda Tully, Justine Daly, John Attia and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Melanie KingslandHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia. melanie.kingsland@health.nsw.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4744-8465
Jenna HollisHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia.
Eva FarragherHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia.
Luke WolfendenHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia.
Karen CampbellInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Craig PennellSchool of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Penny ReevesSchool of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Belinda TullyHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia.
Justine DalyHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia.
John AttiaSchool of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Christopher OldmeadowSchool of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Mandy HunterNursing and Midwifery Services, Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.
Henry MurraySchool of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Francesco PaolucciFaculty of Business and Law, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Maralyn FoureurSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Chris RisselThe Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sax Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Karen GillhamHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia.
John WiggersHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute · AUHunter New England Local Health District · AUJohn Hunter Hospital · AUDeakin University · AUFlinders University · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AUUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

national health and medical research council APP1189756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWeight gain during pregnancy that is outside of recommended levels is associated with a range of adverse outcomes for the mother and child, including gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia, preterm birth, and obesity. Internationally, 60-80% of pregnant women report gaining weight outside of recommended levels. While guideline recommendations and RCT evidence support the provision of antenatal care that supports healthy gestational weight gain, less than 10% of health professionals routinely weigh pregnant women; discuss weight gain, diet, and physical activity; and provide a referral for additional support. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of an implementation intervention in increasing the provision of recommended gestational weight gain care by maternity services.

methodsA stepped-wedge controlled trial, with a staggered implementation intervention, will be conducted across maternity services in three health sectors in New South Wales, Australia. The implementation intervention will consist of evidence-based, locally-tailored strategies including guidelines and procedures, reminders and prompts, leadership support, champions, training, and monitoring and feedback. Primary outcome measures will be the proportion of women who report receiving (i) assessment of gestational weight gain; (ii) advice on gestational weight gain, dietary intake, and physical activity; and (iii) offer of referral to a telephone coaching service or local dietetics service. Measurement of outcomes will occur via telephone interviews with a random sample of women who attend antenatal appointments each week. Economic analyses will be undertaken to assess the cost, cost-consequence, cost-effectiveness, and budget impact of the implementation intervention. Receipt of all care elements, acceptance of referral, weight gain during pregnancy, diet quality, and physical activity will be measured as secondary outcomes. Process measures including acceptability, adoption, fidelity, and reach will be reported. DISCUSSION: This will be the first controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a implementation intervention in improving antenatal care that addresses gestational weight gain. The findings will inform decision-making by maternity services and policy agencies and, if the intervention is demonstrated to be effective, could be applied at scale to benefit the health of women and children across Australia and internationally.

trial registrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12621000054819 . Registered on 22 January 2021.

Indexed as

AntenatalEffectivenessImplementationNutritionPhysical activityPregnancyProtocolStepped-wedge trialWeight

Identifiers

PMID34666840
PMCPMC8525056
OpenAlexW3206037394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.