Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34666835›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2021

The effects of psychological risk factors at work on cognitive failures through the accident proneness.

Milad Abbasi, Mohsen Falahati, Masoumeh Kaydani, Rohollah Fallah Madvari, Ahmad Mehri, Maryam Ghaljahi, Saeid Yazdanirad

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Milad AbbasiOccupational Health Engineering, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Saveh University of Medical Sciences, Saveh, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0787-1533
Mohsen FalahatiOccupational Health Engineering, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Saveh University of Medical Sciences, Saveh, Iran.
Masoumeh KaydaniDepartment of Occupational Health Engineering, Shoushtar Faculty of Medical Sciences, Shoushtar, Iran.
Rohollah Fallah MadvariDepartment of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Ahmad MehriDepartment of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences, Hamedan, Iran.
Maryam GhaljahiDepartment of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, Iran.
Saeid YazdaniradOccupational Health Engineering, School of Health, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran. saeedyazdanirad@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5251-6637
Saveh University of Medical Sciences · IRHamedan University of Medical Sciences · IRIslamic Azad University, Shoushtar Branch · IRShahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services · IRShahrekord University of Medical Sciences · IRZabol University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVarious agents such as psychosocial items and accident proneness can affect cognitive failures through different paths. The probable paths are the direct effects of workplace psychosocial items on cognitive failures and their indirect effects on cognitive failures through the mediator variable of accident proneness, which has not yet been studied by others. Thus, the present study aimed to investigate these paths.

methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted on 164 male employees of Karoon Sugar Company in 2018. The participants were asked to complete a background and demographic questionnaire, Broadbent cognitive failures scale, accident proneness questionnaire, and Copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire. Obtained data were analyzed and modeled using the statistical descriptive method, ANOVA, independent t-test, Pearson correlation test, and path analysis in the SPSS and AMOS software.

resultsThe results of the path analysis showed that, not only, some psychosocial risk items had a significant direct effect on cognitive failures, but also, they could affect cognitive failures through the accident proneness, indirectly. Work-family conflict and social support from supervisors by coefficients of 0.188 and - 0.187 had the highest direct effects, respectively. The highest indirect effects belonged to justice and respect, and work-family conflict by coefficients of - 0.220 and 0.199, respectively. The highest total effects were also related to the work-family conflict and justice and respect by coefficients of 0.387 and - 0.381, respectively.

conclusionsIn total, our results showed that some psychological items could, directly and indirectly, increase cognitive failure through accident proneness.

Indexed as

Accident PronenessCognitionCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMaleRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesAccident pronenessCognitive failureOccupational factorPsychosocial factor

Identifiers

PMID34666835
PMCPMC8527752
OpenAlexW3206583752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.