Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34666801›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2021

Wheat physiology predictor: predicting physiological traits in wheat from hyperspectral reflectance measurements using deep learning.

Robert T Furbank, Viridiana Silva-Perez, John R Evans, Anthony G Condon, Gonzalo M Estavillo, Wennan He, Saul Newman, Richard Poiré, Ashley Hall, Zhen He

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Robert T FurbankARC Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Research School of Biology. Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia. robert.furbank@anu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8700-6613
Viridiana Silva-PerezAgriculture Victoria, 110 Natimuk Road, Horsham, VIC, 3400, Australia.
John R EvansARC Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Research School of Biology. Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
Anthony G CondonCSIRO Agriculture and Food, PO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
Gonzalo M EstavilloCSIRO Agriculture and Food, PO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
Wennan HeARC Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Research School of Biology. Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
Saul NewmanARC Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Research School of Biology. Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
Richard PoiréAustralian Plant Phenomics Facility, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
Ashley HallDepartment of Computer Science and Computer Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia.
Zhen HeDepartment of Computer Science and Computer Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia.

Funding

australian research council CE140100015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe need for rapid in-field measurement of key traits contributing to yield over many thousands of genotypes is a major roadblock in crop breeding. Recently, leaf hyperspectral reflectance data has been used to train machine learning models using partial least squares regression (PLSR) to rapidly predict genetic variation in photosynthetic and leaf traits across wheat populations, among other species. However, the application of published PLSR spectral models is limited by a fixed spectral wavelength range as input and the requirement of separate custom-built models for each trait and wavelength range. In addition, the use of reflectance spectra from the short-wave infrared region requires expensive multiple detector spectrometers. The ability to train a model that can accommodate input from different spectral ranges would potentially make such models extensible to more affordable sensors. Here we compare the accuracy of prediction of PLSR with various deep learning approaches and an ensemble model, each trained and tested using previously published data sets.

resultsWe demonstrate that the accuracy of PLSR to predict photosynthetic and related leaf traits in wheat can be improved with deep learning-based and ensemble models without overfitting. Additionally, these models can be flexibly applied across spectral ranges without significantly compromising accuracy.

conclusionThe method reported provides an improved prediction of wheat leaf and photosynthetic traits from leaf hyperspectral reflectance and do not require a full range, high cost leaf spectrometer. We provide a web service for deploying these algorithms to predict physiological traits in wheat from a variety of spectral data sets, with important implications for wheat yield prediction and crop breeding.

Indexed as

Deep learningHyperspectral reflectanceMachine learningPhotosynthesisWheat

Identifiers

PMID34666801
PMCPMC8527791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.