Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34666722›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

The trajectories of depressive symptoms among working adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal analysis of the InHamilton COVID-19 study.

Divya Joshi, Andrea Gonzalez, Lauren Griffith, Laura Duncan, Harriet MacMillan, Melissa Kimber, Brenda Vrkljan, James MacKillop, Marla Beauchamp, Nick Kates and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Mental health patterns of physiotherapists in South Africa during COVID-19.The South African journal of physiotherapy · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Divya JoshiDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Andrea GonzalezLabarge Centre for Mobility in Aging, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Lauren GriffithDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Laura DuncanDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Harriet MacMillanDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Melissa KimberDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Brenda VrkljanLabarge Centre for Mobility in Aging, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
James MacKillopDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Marla BeauchampLabarge Centre for Mobility in Aging, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Nick KatesDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Parminder RainaDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. praina@mcmaster.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLongitudinal studies examining the impact of changes in COVID-19 pandemic-related stressors and experiences, and coping styles on the mental health trajectory of employed individuals during the lockdown are limited. The study examined the mental health trajectories of a sample of employed adults in Hamilton, Ontario during the initial lockdown and after the re-opening following the first wave in Canada. Further, this study also identified the pandemic-related stressors and coping strategies associated with changes in depressive symptoms in employed adults during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsThe InHamilton COVID-19 longitudinal study involved 579 employees aged 22-88 years from a large public university in an urban area of Hamilton, Ontario at baseline (April 2020). Participants were followed monthly with 6 waves of data collected between April and November 2020. A growth mixture modeling approach was used to identify distinct groups of adults who followed a similar pattern of depressive symptoms over time and to describe the longitudinal change in the outcome within and among the identified sub-groups.

resultsOur results showed two distinct trajectories of change with 66.2% of participants displaying low-consistent patterns of depressive symptoms, and 33.8% of participants displaying high-increasing depressive symptom patterns. COVID-19 pandemic-related experiences including health concerns, caregiving burden, and lack of access to resources were associated with worsening of the depressive symptom trajectories. Frequent use of dysfunctional coping strategies and less frequent use of emotion-focused coping strategies were associated with the high and increasing depressive symptom pattern.

conclusionsThe negative mental health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic are specific to subgroups within the population and stressors may persist and worsen over time. Providing access to evidence-informed approaches that foster adaptive coping, alleviate the depressive symptoms, and promote the mental health of working adults is critical.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAdultCommunicable Disease ControlDepressionHumansLongitudinal StudiesOntarioSARS-CoV-2CaregivingCoping strategiesCOVID-19Depressive symptomsEmployed adultsGrowth mixture modelingMental health

Identifiers

PMID34666722
PMCPMC8526051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.