Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34666714›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2021

Classification of moving coronary calcified plaques based on motion artifacts using convolutional neural networks: a robotic simulating study on influential factors.

Magdalena Dobrolińska, Niels van der Werf, Marcel Greuter, Beibei Jiang, Riemer Slart, Xueqian Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Magdalena DobrolińskaDepartments of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7997-5884
Niels van der WerfDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0138-052X
Marcel GreuterDepartments of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5721-9159
Beibei JiangRadiology Department, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Haining Rd.100, Shanghai, 200080, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3182-5032
Riemer SlartDepartments of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5565-1164
Xueqian XieRadiology Department, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Haining Rd.100, Shanghai, 200080, China. xiexueqian@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6669-0097

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMotion artifacts affect the images of coronary calcified plaques. This study utilized convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to classify the motion-contaminated images of moving coronary calcified plaques and to determine the influential factors for the classification performance.

methodsTwo artificial coronary arteries containing four artificial plaques of different densities were placed on a robotic arm in an anthropomorphic thorax phantom. Each artery moved linearly at velocities ranging from 0 to 60 mm/s. CT examinations were performed with four state-of-the-art CT systems. All images were reconstructed with filtered back projection and at least three levels of iterative reconstruction. Each examination was performed at 100%, 80% and 40% radiation dose. Three deep CNN architectures were used for training the classification models. A five-fold cross-validation procedure was applied to validate the models.

resultsThe accuracy of the CNN classification was 90.2 ± 3.1%, 90.6 ± 3.5%, and 90.1 ± 3.2% for the artificial plaques using Inception v3, ResNet101 and DenseNet201 CNN architectures, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, higher density and increasing velocity were significantly associated with higher classification accuracy (all P < 0.001). The classification accuracy in all three CNN architectures was not affected by CT system, radiation dose or image reconstruction method (all P > 0.05).

conclusionsThe CNN achieved a high accuracy of 90% when classifying the motion-contaminated images into the actual category, regardless of different vendors, velocities, radiation doses, and reconstruction algorithms, which indicates the potential value of using a CNN to correct calcium scores.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerRoboticsTomography, X-Ray ComputedArtifactsCoronary Artery DiseaseMotionPhantoms, ImagingPlaque, AtheroscleroticRadiation DosageRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedArtifactsArtificial intelligenceImaging phantomsX-ray computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID34666714
PMCPMC8524892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.