Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34666711›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2021

Implementing advance care planning in early dementia care: results and insights from a pilot interventional trial.

Francesca Bosisio, Anca-Cristina Sterie, Eve Rubli Truchard, Ralf J Jox

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03615027 (Dementia-specific Intervention of Advance Care Planning), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03615027 naunknown statusnot on this map

Dementia-specific Intervention of Advance Care Planning

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Lausanne HospitalsRan2018 to 2019Enrolled60ConditionsAlzheimer DiseaseArmsDementia-specific advance care planning
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Benefits and Burdens of Research Participation: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review in Palliative and End-of-Life Care.Journal of hospice and palliative nursing : JHPN : the official journal of the Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. User appraisal of a booklet for advance care planning in multiple sclerosis: a multicenter, qualitative Italian study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Francesca BosisioService of Geriatric Medicine and Geriatric Rehabilitation, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland. Francesca.bosisio@chuv.ch.
Anca-Cristina SterieService of Geriatric Medicine and Geriatric Rehabilitation, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Eve Rubli TruchardService of Geriatric Medicine and Geriatric Rehabilitation, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ralf J JoxService of Palliative and Supportive Care, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvance care planning (ACP) is particularly appropriate for persons with early dementia (PWED) since it promotes conversations about dementia-specific illness scenarios, addresses inconsistencies between advance directives and patients' observed behavior, emphasizes prospective and relational autonomy, and may be generally consistent with older persons' decision-making needs. However, despite evidence of its benefits, ACP is yet to become widely used among PWED. In this paper, we present a dementia-specific tool developed in Western Switzerland, discuss results of a pilot trial designed to promote ACP among PWED and their relatives, and discuss the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and the study protocol in prevision of a large scale trial.

methodsThis one-arm pre-post pilot trial consisted of four visits, with visits 2 and 3 being the ACP intervention. Quantitative outcome measures during visit 1 and 4 assessed the aptitude of the intervention to support PWED autonomy and relatives' knowledge of PWED's preferences. Feasibility was explored according to how the recruitment procedure unfurled and based on the necessary revisions to the study protocol and healthcare providers' reason for excluding a PWED from the study. Acceptability was assessed according to pre-post evaluations, difficulties regarding the intervention or trial participation, and pre-post qualitative interviews regarding participants' reasons to participate to the study, satisfaction with the tool and difficulties perceived.

resultsThe ACP intervention itself was well received by PWED and their relatives that expressed satisfaction with the procedure, especially regarding the opportunity to discuss a sensitive topic with the help of a facilitator. Five main challenges in terms of feasibility were 1) to locate eligible patients, 2) to tailor recruitment procedures to recruitment locations, 3) to adapt inclusion criteria to clinical routines, 4) to engage PWED and their relatives in ACP, and 5) to design a trial that does not burden PWED. Despite these challenges, the intervention increased the number of advance directives, the concordance between PWED's preferences and relatives' decision on their behalf, and relatives' perceived control over healthcare decisions.

conclusionMisconceptions about dementia and ACP, in the patient, relatives, and healthcare providers, combined with structural and institutional challenges, have the power to impede research and implementation of ACP in dementia care. For this reason, we conclude that a large scale trial to test a dementia-specific tool of ACP is currently not feasible in Western Switzerland and should be endorsed in a systemic approach of ACP.

trial registrationThis trial was registered in the database clinicaltrial.gov with the number NCT03615027 .

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningDementiaAdvance DirectivesAgedAged, 80 and overCommunicationHumansProspective StudiesAcceptabilityAdvance care planningAlzheimer’s diseaseDementiaFeasibilityGoals of careTrial

Identifiers

PMID34666711
PMCPMC8524211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.