Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34666709›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2021

Management and outcomes in critically ill nonagenarian versus octogenarian patients.

Raphael Romano Bruno, Bernhard Wernly, Malte Kelm, Ariane Boumendil, Alessandro Morandi, Finn H Andersen, Antonio Artigas, Stefano Finazzi, Maurizio Cecconi, Steffen Christensen and 26 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03134807 completednot on this map

The Very Old Intensive Care Patient: A Multinational Prospective Observation Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of BergenRan2016 to 2017Enrolled5,132ConditionsCritical Illness, Old Age, Debility, SurvivalArmsObservation prospective
NCT03370692 completednot on this map

Development and Validation of a Prognostic Score in the Very Old ICU Patients (≥80 Years)

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of BergenRan2018 to 2019Enrolled3,900ConditionsAged, 80 and Over, Critical CareArmsCognitive assesment, Frailty assessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Outcomes of Nonagenarian Patients in Vascular Surgery Service in a Tertiary Institution.Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists · 2026
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Prognosis of major trauma in patients older than 85 years admitted to the ICU, a registry-based study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors.

Raphael Romano Bruno *Department of Cardiology, Pulmonary Diseases, and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University of Duesseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Bernhard Wernly *Department of Anaesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Malte KelmDepartment of Cardiology, Pulmonary Diseases, and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University of Duesseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Ariane BoumendilService de Réanimation Médicale, Publique-Hôpital de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, F-75012, Paris, France.
Alessandro MorandiDepartment of Rehabilitation Hospital Ancelle di Cremona, Cremona, Italy.
Finn H AndersenDepartment Of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Ålesund Hospital, Ålesund, Norway.
Antonio ArtigasDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, CIBERes Corporacion Sanitaria Universitaria Parc Tauli, Barcelona, Spain.
Stefano FinazziIstituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Ranica, BG, Italy.
Maurizio CecconiDepartment of Anaesthesia, IRCCS Instituto Clínico Humanitas, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Steffen ChristensenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Loredana FaraldiGrande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Michael LichtenauerDepartment of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Johanna M MuessigDepartment of Cardiology, Pulmonary Diseases, and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University of Duesseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Brian MarshMater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Rui MorenoUnidade de Cuidados Intensivos Neurocríticos e Trauma, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Lisboa, Hospital de São José, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Nova Médical School, Lisbon, Portugal.
Sandra OeyenDepartment of Intensive Care, 1K12IC Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Christina Agvald ÖhmanKarolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden.
Bernardo Bollen PintoDepartment of Acute Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ivo W SolimanDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Wojciech SzczeklikIntensive Care and Perioperative Medicine Division, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Andreas ValentinKardinal Schwarzenberg Hospital, Schwarzach, Austria.
Ximena WatsonSt George's University Hospital, London, UK.
Susannah LeaverResearch Lead Critical Care Directorate St George's Hospital, London, UK.
Carole BoulangerNAHP Committee ESICM, Intensive Care Unit, Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
Sten WaltherLinkoping University Hospital, Linkoping, Sweden.
Joerg C SchefoldDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Universitätsspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Michael JoannidisDivision of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Yuriy NalapkoEuropean Wellness International, ICU, Luhansk, Ukraine.
Muhammed ElhadiAlkhums Hospital, ICU, Tripoli, Libya.
Jesper FjølnerDepartment of Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Tilemachos ZafeiridisIntensive Care Unit General Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece.
Dylan W De LangeDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Bertrand GuidetService de Réanimation Médicale, Publique-Hôpital de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, F-75012, Paris, France.
Hans FlaattenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Christian JungDepartment of Cardiology, Pulmonary Diseases, and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University of Duesseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany. Christian.Jung@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
VIP2 study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntensive care unit (ICU) patients age 90 years or older represent a growing subgroup and place a huge financial burden on health care resources despite the benefit being unclear. This leads to ethical problems. The present investigation assessed the differences in outcome between nonagenarian and octogenarian ICU patients.

methodsWe included 7900 acutely admitted older critically ill patients from two large, multinational studies. The primary outcome was 30-day-mortality, and the secondary outcome was ICU-mortality. Baseline characteristics consisted of frailty assessed by the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), ICU-management, and outcomes were compared between octogenarian (80-89.9 years) and nonagenarian (> 90 years) patients. We used multilevel logistic regression to evaluate differences between octogenarians and nonagenarians.

resultsThe nonagenarians were 10% of the entire cohort. They experienced a higher percentage of frailty (58% vs 42%; p < 0.001), but lower SOFA scores at admission (6 + 5 vs. 7 + 6; p < 0.001). ICU-management strategies were different. Octogenarians required higher rates of organ support and nonagenarians received higher rates of life-sustaining treatment limitations (40% vs. 33%; p < 0.001). ICU mortality was comparable (27% vs. 27%; p = 0.973) but a higher 30-day-mortality (45% vs. 40%; p = 0.029) was seen in the nonagenarians. After multivariable adjustment nonagenarians had no significantly increased risk for 30-day-mortality (aOR 1.25 (95% CI 0.90-1.74; p = 0.19)).

conclusionAfter adjustment for confounders, nonagenarians demonstrated no higher 30-day mortality than octogenarian patients. In this study, being age 90 years or more is no particular risk factor for an adverse outcome. This should be considered- together with illness severity and pre-existing functional capacity - to effectively guide triage decisions.

trial registrationNCT03134807 and NCT03370692 .

Indexed as

Critical IllnessFrailtyAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesCritical CareHospitalizationHumansFrailtyIntensive care medicineNonagenariansOctogenariansOutcome

Identifiers

PMID34666709
PMCPMC8524896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.