ArticleBMC cancer2021
The implementation of colorectal cancer screening interventions in low-and middle-income countries: a scoping review.
Article in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Global colorectal cancer screening programs and coverage rate estimation: an evidence synthesis.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Global, regional, national burden of colorectal cancer from 1990 to 2021, with projections of incidence to 2050: a systematic analysis of the global burden of disease study 2021.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs in Latin America: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Patient Education Strategies for Oncology Patients in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.The oncologist · 2023Pooled it
- Availability of Cancer Screening Across HIV Treatment Sites in the IeDEA Consortium.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Emerging trends in the global burden of colorectal cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- A global scoping review of interventions to increase participation in screening programmes for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer between 2016 and 2025.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Hypoxia Associated Integration of Epigenetic, Metabolic, and Immune Biomarkers in Blood and Urine for Early Colorectal Cancer Detection: A Multimarker Panel.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The colorectal cancer screening gap in Türkiye: A tripartite survey of barriers among patients and surgeons.Turkish journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Predictive Nomogram for Diagnosing Colorectal Cancer Based on Immune-Nutritional Score.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Oral paraneoplastic manifestations and findings associated with extra-oral surgically treated malignancies: a prospective cross-sectional study of 300 cases.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Widening Health Inequality and Causal Metabolic Drivers in Global Colorectal Cancer: A Multi-Dimensional Study.Cancer informatics · 2026Article
- Colorectal cancer awareness and acceptance of fecal immunochemical test screening in Qassim, Saudi Arabia.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Global burden of colorectal cancer in 2022 and projections to 2050: incidence and mortality estimates from GLOBOCAN.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Facilitator and barrier perspectives on learning and implementing high-resolution anoscopy in Abuja, Nigeria: a qualitative study.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Colorectal Cancer in Mississippi: How to Change the Tide of Bad News to a Success Story?Cureus · 2025Review
- Review
- Cancer screening and its associated factors in hypertensive individuals: new insights from the 2021 STEPs national study in Iran.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Evaluating the implementation of colorectal cancer screening practices at King Abdul-Aziz Medical City, Riyadh.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLow- and middle-income countries (LMICs) experienced increasing rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence in the last decade and lower 5-year survival rates compared to high-income countries (HICs) where the implementation of screening and treatment services have advanced. This review scoped and mapped the literature regarding the content, implementation and uptake of CRC screening interventions as well as opportunities and challenges for the implementation of CRC screening interventions in LMICs.
methodsWe systematically followed a five-step scoping review framework to identify and review relevant literature about CRC screening in LMICs, written in the English language before February 2020. We searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Google Scholar for studies targeting the general, asymptomatic, at-risk adult population. The TIDieR tool and an implementation checklist were used to extract data from empirical studies; and we extracted data-informed insights from policy reviews and commentaries.
resultsCRC screening interventions (n = 24 studies) were implemented in nine middle-income countries. Population-based screening programmes (n = 11) as well as small-scale screening interventions (n = 13) utilised various recruitment strategies. Interventions that recruited participants face-to-face (alone or in combination with other recruitment strategies) (10/15), opportunistic clinic-based screening interventions (5/6) and educational interventions combined with screening (3/4), seemed to be the strategies that consistently achieved an uptake of > 65% in LMICs. FOBT/FIT and colonoscopy uptake ranged between 14 and 100%. The most commonly reported implementation indicator was 'uptake/reach'. There was an absence of detail regarding implementation indicators and there is a need to improve reporting practice in order to disseminate learning about how to implement programmes.
conclusionOpportunities and challenges for the implementation of CRC screening programmes were related to the reporting of CRC cases and screening, cost-effective screening methods, knowledge about CRC and screening, staff resources and training, infrastructure of the health care system, financial resources, public health campaigns, policy commitment from governments, patient navigation, planning of screening programmes and quality assurance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.