Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34666682›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2021

Challenges and visions for managing pain-related insomnia in primary care using the hybrid CBT approach: a small-scale qualitative interview study with GPs, nurses, and practice managers.

V E J Collard, C Moore, V Nichols, D R Ellard, S Patel, H Sandhu, H Parsons, U Sharma, M Underwood, J Madan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

V E J CollardDepartment of Psychology, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. t.collard@warwick.ac.uk.
C MooreDepartment of Psychology, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
V NicholsClinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
D R EllardClinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
S PatelClinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
H SandhuClinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
H ParsonsClinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
U SharmaUniversity/User Teaching and Research Action Partnership, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
M UnderwoodClinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
J MadanClinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
N K Y TangDepartment of Psychology, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic pain and insomnia have a complex, bidirectional relationship - addressing sleep complaints alongside pain may be key to alleviating patient-reported distress and disability. Healthcare professionals have consistently reported wanting to offer psychologically informed chronic pain management at the primary care level. Research in secondary care has demonstrated good treatment efficacy of hybrid CBT for chronic pain and insomnia. However, primary care is typically the main point of treatment entry, hence may be better situated to offer treatments using a multidisciplinary approach. In this study, primary care service providers' perception of feasibility for tackling pain-related insomnia in primary care was explored.

methodsThe data corpus originates from a feasibility trial exploring hybrid CBT for chronic pain and insomnia delivered in primary care. This formed three in-depth group interviews with primary care staff (n = 9) from different primary care centres from the same NHS locale. All interviews were conducted on-site using a semi-structured approach. Verbal data was recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the thematic analysis process.

resultsEight themes were identified - 1) Discrepant conceptualisations of the chronic pain-insomnia relationship and clinical application, 2) Mismatch between patients' needs and available treatment offerings, 3) Awareness of psychological complexities, 4) Identified treatment gap for pain-related insomnia, 5) Lack of funding and existing infrastructure for new service development, 6) General shortage of psychological services for complex health conditions, 7) Multidisciplinary team provision with pain specialist input, and 8) Accessibility through primary care. These mapped onto four domains - Current understanding and practice, Perceived facilitators, Perceived barriers, Ideal scenarios for a new treatment service - which reflected the focus of our investigation. Taken together these provide key context for understanding challenges faced by health care professionals in considering and developing a new clinical service.

conclusionsPrimary care service providers from one locale advocate better, multidisciplinary treatment provision for chronic pain and insomnia. Findings suggest that situating this in primary care could be a feasible option, but this requires systemic support and specialist input as well as definitive trials for success.

Indexed as

Chronic PainNursesSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersHumansPain ManagementPrimary Health CareChronic painCognitive behaviour(al)therapy (CBT)Hybrid CBTInsomniaPain managementPatient and public involvement (PPI)Primary carePsychological treatmentSleepThematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID34666682
PMCPMC8527665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.