Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34666678›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2021

Optimising personal continuity for older patients in general practice: a study protocol for a cluster randomised stepped wedge pragmatic trial.

Lex J J Groot, Henk J Schers, Jako S Burgers, Francois G Schellevis, Martin Smalbrugge, Annemarie A Uijen, Peter M van de Ven, Henriëtte E van der Horst, Otto R Maarsingh

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Optimising personal continuity in general practice: process evaluation of a toolkit.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lex J J GrootDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, location VU University Medical Centre, van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081, BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. l.groot@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-1129-3315
Henk J SchersDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein 21, 6525, EZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jako S BurgersMUMC+/ Maastricht University, Department of General Practice, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Universiteitssingel 40, 6229, ER, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Francois G SchellevisDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, location VU University Medical Centre, van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081, BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Martin SmalbruggeDepartment of Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, location VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1109, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Annemarie A UijenDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein 21, 6525, EZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Peter M van de VenDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1089a, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Henriëtte E van der HorstDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, location VU University Medical Centre, van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081, BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Otto R MaarsinghDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, location VU University Medical Centre, van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081, BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContinuity of care, in particular personal continuity, is a core principle of general practice and is associated with many benefits such as a better patient-provider relationship and lower mortality. However, personal continuity is under pressure due to changes in society and healthcare. This affects older patients more than younger patients. As the number of older patients will double the coming decades, an intervention to optimise personal continuity for this group is highly warranted.

methodsFollowing the UK Medical Research Council framework for complex Interventions, we will develop and evaluate an intervention to optimise personal continuity for older patients in general practice. In phase 0, we will perform a literature study to provide the theoretical basis for the intervention. In phase I we will define the components of the intervention by performing surveys and focus groups among patients, general practitioners, practice assistants and practice nurses, concluded by a Delphi study among members of our group. In phase II, we will test and finalise the intervention with input from a pilot study in two general practices. In phase III, we will perform a stepped wedge cluster randomised pragmatic trial. The primary outcome measure is continuity of care from the patients' perspective, measured by the Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire. Secondary outcome measures are level of implementation, barriers and facilitators for implementation, acceptability and feasibility of the intervention. In phase IV, we will establish the conditions for large-scale implementation. DISCUSSION: This is the first study to investigate an intervention for improving personal continuity for older patients in general practice. If proven effective, our intervention will enable General practitioners to improve the quality of care for their increasing population of older patients. The pragmatic design of the study will enable evaluation in real-life conditions, facilitating future implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Netherlands Trial Register, trial NL8132 . Registered 2 November 2019.

Indexed as

General PracticeGeneral PractitionersDelivery of Health CareFamily PracticeHumansPilot ProjectsPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAgedContinuity of patient careInterventionQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID34666678
PMCPMC8526277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.