Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34666573›Full record

ArticleQuarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)2022

The profile of real-time competition in spoken and written word recognition: More similar than different.

Kristi Hendrickson, Keith Apfelbaum, Claire Goodwin, Christina Blomquist, Kelsey Klein, Bob McMurray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Decoupling speech processing from time.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The development of lexical competition in written- and spoken-word recognition.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kristi HendricksonDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8843-6615
Keith ApfelbaumDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Claire GoodwinDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Christina BlomquistDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Kelsey KleinDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Bob McMurrayDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.

Funding

The Development of Real Time Spoken and Written Word Recognition: Cognitive Bases of Language and Educational OutcomesR01DC008089 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI MCMURRAY, BOB · 2007 to 2023
$7.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Word recognition occurs across two sensory modalities: auditory (spoken words) and visual (written words). While each faces different challenges, they are often described in similar terms as a competition process by which multiple lexical candidates are activated and compete for recognition. While there is a general consensus regarding the types of words that compete during spoken word recognition, there is less consensus for written word recognition. The present study develops a novel version of the Visual World Paradigm (VWP) to examine written word recognition and uses this to assess the nature of the competitor set during word recognition in both modalities using the same experimental design. For both spoken and written words, we found evidence for activation of onset competitors (cohorts, e.g.,

Indexed as

Speech PerceptionRecognition, PsychologyEye-trackinglexical competitionspoken word recognitionVisual World Paradigmwritten word recognition

Identifiers

PMID34666573
PMCPMC13251876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.