Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34666552›Full record

ArticleOmega2023

COVID-19 Bereavement in Ten Latin American Countries: Measurement Invariance of the Pandemic Grief Scale and Its Relation to Suicidal Ideation.

Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, Pablo D Valencia, Lindsey W Vilca, Sherman A Lee, Carlos Carbajal-León, Andrea Vivanco-Vidal, Daniela Saroli-Araníbar, Mario Reyes-Bossio, Michel White, Claudio Rojas-Jara and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Tomás Caycho-RodríguezFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Privada del Norte, Universidad Privada del Norte, Lima, Perú.ORCID 0000-0002-5349-7570
Pablo D ValenciaFacultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Tlanepantla de Baz, State of Mexico, Mexico.
Lindsey W VilcaDepartamento de Psicología, Universidad Peruana Unión, Lima, Perú.
Sherman A LeeDepartment of Psychology, Christopher Newport University, Christopher Newport University, Newport News, Virginia, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1878-3472
Carlos Carbajal-LeónFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Privada del Norte, Universidad Privada del Norte, Lima, Perú.
Andrea Vivanco-VidalFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima, Perú.
Daniela Saroli-AraníbarFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima, Perú.
Mario Reyes-BossioFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima, Perú.
Michel WhiteDirección General de Investigación, Universidad Peruana Unión, Universidad Peruana Unión, Lima, Perú.
Claudio Rojas-JaraFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Departamento de Psicología, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca, Chile.
Roberto Polanco-CarrascoCuadernos de Neuropsicología, Centro de Estudios Académicos en Neuropsicología, Rancagua Chile.
Miguel GallegosPontificia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, Brasil.
Mauricio CervigniFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Privada del Norte, Universidad Privada del Norte, Lima, Perú.
Pablo MartinoCentro de Investigación en Neurociencias de Rosario, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Rosario, Argentina.
Diego Alejandro PalaciosCentro de Desarrollo Humano, Universidad Mariano Gálvez, Guatemala, Guatemala.
Rodrigo Moreta-HerreraEscuela de Psicología, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Ambato, Ecuador.
Antonio Samaniego-PinhoCarrera de Psicología, Facultad de Filosofía, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, Asunción, Paraguay.ORCID 0000-0003-4178-6639
Marlon Elías Lobos RiveraEscuela de Psicología, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Tecnológica de El Salvador, Universidad Tecnológica de El Salvador, San Salvador, El Salvador.
Andrés Buschiazzo FigaresInstituto Alfred Adler Uruguay, Centro de Estudios Adlerianos, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Diana Ximena Puerta-CortésPrograma de Psicología, Universidad de Ibagué, Universidad de Ibagué, Ibagué, Colombia.
Ibraín Enrique Corrales-ReyesServicio de Cirugía Maxilofacial, Hospital General Universitario Carlos Manuel de Céspedes, Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de Granma, Bayamo, Granma, Cuba.
Raymundo CalderónCarrera de Psicología, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Valle de México, Universidad del Valle de México, Ciudad de México, México.
Bismarck Pinto TapiaCarrera de Psicología, Universidad Católica Boliviana San Pablo, La Paz, Bolivia.
Ilka Franco FerrariPontificia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, Brasil.
Carmen Flores-MendozaFacultad de Filosofía y Ciencias Humanas. Universidad Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, Brasil.
Walter L Arias GallegosDepartamento de Psicología, Universidad Católica San Pablo, Arequipa, Perú.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate the cross-cultural measurement invariance of the Pandemic Grief Scale (PGS) in ten Latin American countries. A total of 2,321 people who had lost a family member or other loved one due to COVID-19 participated, with a mean age of 34.22 years old (SD = 11.99). In addition to the PGS, a single item of suicidal ideation was applied. The unidimensional model of the PGS had adequate fit in most countries and good reliability estimates. There was evidence of measurement invariance by country and gender. Also, a one-point increase in the PGS was associated with an almost twofold increase in the odds of suicidal ideation. Scores greater than or equal to 4 on the PGS are proposed as a cut off to identify individuals with suicidal ideation. Strong evidence of the cross-cultural validity of the PGS is provided.

Indexed as

BereavementCOVID-19AdultGriefHumansLatin AmericaPandemicsReproducibility of ResultsSuicidal IdeationCOVID-19cross-culturalgriefinvarianceLatin America

Identifiers

PMID34666552
PMCPMC10647883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.