Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34666528›Full record

SynthesisChronic respiratory disease

Effect of interval compared to continuous exercise training on physiological responses in patients with chronic respiratory diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Charikleia Alexiou, Lesley Ward, Emily Hume, Matthew Armstrong, Mick Wilkinson, Ioannis Vogiatzis

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Chronic respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Upper-limb intervalERJ open research · 2024
    Article
  12. Pulmonary rehabilitation and physical interventions.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Charikleia AlexiouDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, 373117Northumbria University Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5924-4363
Lesley WardDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, 373117Northumbria University Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Emily HumeDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, 373117Northumbria University Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Matthew ArmstrongDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, 373117Northumbria University Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Mick WilkinsonDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, 373117Northumbria University Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Ioannis VogiatzisDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, 373117Northumbria University Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Northumbria University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundCurrent evidence suggests that interval exercise training (IET) and continuous exercise training (CET) produce comparable benefits in exercise capacity, cardiorespiratory fitness and symptoms in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, the effects of these modalities have only been reviewed in patients with COPD. This meta-analysis compares the effectiveness of IET versus CET on exercise capacity, cardiorespiratory fitness and exertional symptoms in patients with chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs).

Indexed as

Exercise TolerancePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveDyspneaExerciseHumansQuality of Lifeexerciserespiratory diseasesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34666528
PMCPMC8532221
OpenAlexW3191720267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.