Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34666346›Full record

Trial reportAnesthesiology2021

Spinal Anesthesia with Targeted Sedation based on Bispectral Index Values Compared with General Anesthesia with Masked Bispectral Index Values to Reduce Delirium: The SHARP Randomized Controlled Trial.

Charles H Brown, Charles Edwards, Charles Lin, Emily Ledford Jones, Lisa R Yanek, Melody Esmaili, Yara Gorashi, Richard Skelton, Daniel Kaganov, Ryan Curto and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Anesthesiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. A Real-Time Neurophysiologic Stress Test for the Aging Brain: Novel Perioperative and ICU Applications of EEG in Older Surgical Patients.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Charles H BrownDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Charles EdwardsMaryland Spine Center at Mercy, Baltimore, Maryland.
Charles LinMercy Anesthesiology Associates, Baltimore, Maryland.
Emily Ledford JonesDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Lisa R YanekDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Melody EsmailiMercy Anesthesiology Associates, Baltimore, Maryland.
Yara GorashiTufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Richard SkeltonUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Daniel KaganovWake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina.
Ryan CurtoUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Noah L LessingUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Stephanie ChaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Elizabeth ColantuoniDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Karin NeufeldDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Frederick SieberDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Clayton L DeanMaryland Spine Center at Mercy, Baltimore, Maryland.
Charles W Hoguethe Department of Anesthesiology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Johns Hopkins University · USMercy Medical Center · USSisters of Mercy Health System · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USNorthwestern University · USTufts University · USUniversity of Miami · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

Monitoring Cerebral Autoregulation in Patients Undergoing Traumatic Hip Fracture Surgery to Improve Postoperative OutcomesK76AG057020 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BROWN, CHARLES HUGH · 2017 to 2021
$1.1M
Prevention and Cognitive Consequences of Postoperative DeliriumK23AG051783 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BROWN, CHARLES HUGH · 2017 to 2017
$194k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG051783NIA NIH HHS K76 AG057020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReducing depth of anesthesia and anesthetic exposure may help prevent delirium, but trials have been conflicting. Most studies were conducted under general anesthesia or in cognitively impaired patients. It is unclear whether reducing depth of anesthesia beyond levels consistent with general anesthesia reduces delirium in cognitively intact patients. The authors' objective was to determine whether a bundled approach to reduce anesthetic agent exposure as determined by Bispectral Index (BIS) values (spinal anesthesia with targeted sedation based on BIS values) compared with general anesthesia (masked BIS) reduces delirium.

methodsImportant eligibility criteria for this parallel-arm randomized trial were patients 65 yr or greater undergoing lumbar spine fusion. The intervention group received spinal anesthesia with targeted sedation to BIS greater than 60 to 70. The control group received general anesthesia (masked BIS). The primary outcome was delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method daily through postoperative day 3, with blinded assessment.

resultsThe median age of 217 patients in the analysis was 72 (interquartile range, 69 to 77). The median BIS value in the spinal anesthesia with targeted sedation based on BIS values group was 62 (interquartile range, 53 to 70) and in the general anesthesia with masked BIS values group was 45 (interquartile range, 41 to 50; P < 0.001). Incident delirium was not different in the spinal anesthesia with targeted sedation based on BIS values group (25.2% [28 of 111] vs. the general anesthesia with masked BIS values group (18.9% [20 of 106]; P = 0.259; relative risk, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.85 to 1.76]). In prespecified subgroup analyses, the effect of anesthetic strategy differed according to the Mini-Mental State Examination, but not the Charlson Comorbidity Index or age. Two strokes occurred among patients receiving spinal anesthesia and one death among patients receiving general anesthesia.

conclusionsSpinal anesthesia with targeted sedation based on BIS values compared with general anesthesia with masked BIS values did not reduce delirium after lumbar fusion. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE:

Indexed as

AgedAnesthesia, GeneralAnesthesia, SpinalElectroencephalographyEmergence DeliriumFemaleHumansMaleSingle-Blind Method

Identifiers

PMID34666346
PMCPMC8970606
OpenAlexW3207503229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.