ArticleBipolar disorders2022
A graph theory-based whole brain approach to assess mood state differences in adolescents and young adults with bipolar disorder.
Article in Bipolar disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Towards a neurodevelopmental model of bipolar disorder: a critical review of trait- and state-related functional neuroimaging in adolescents and young adults.Molecular psychiatry · 2025Review
- Consensus Paper: Cerebellum and Reward.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2024Review
- A graph theory neuroimaging approach to distinguish the depression of bipolar disorder from major depressive disorder in adolescents and young adults.Journal of affective disorders · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesIdentifying hubs of brain dysfunction in adolescents and young adults with Bipolar I Disorder (BD
methodsFunctional magnetic resonance imaging whole-brain ICD data were investigated for differences across four groups: BD
resultsICD was higher in the BD
conclusionsThis ICD approach supports a PFC hub of inter- and intra-hemispheric frontotemporal dysconnectivity in BD
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.