ArticleAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2022
Urinary tract infections in children: Testing a novel, noninvasive, point-of-care diagnostic marker.
Article in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in patients with symptoms of urinary tract infections: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Pooled it
- Accuracy of NGAL as a Biomarker for Urinary Tract Infection in Young Febrile Children: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.The Journal of pediatrics · 2023Pooled it
- Opposing roles for lipocalins and a CD36 family scavenger receptor in apical extracellular matrix-dependent protection of narrow tube integrity.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2026Article
- Biomarkers for urinary tract infection: present and future perspectives.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesUrinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (uNGAL) appears highly accurate to identify urinary tract infections (UTIs) when obtained via catheterization. Our primary aim was to determine the agreement in uNGAL levels between paired catheter and bag urine specimens. Our secondary aim was to compare the diagnostic test characteristics of quantitative uNGAL, dipstick uNGAL (a potential point-of-care test), and urinalysis (UA).
methodsThis was a prospective study of febrile children < 24 months evaluated for UTIs. We evaluated quantitative uNGAL at a previously identified threshold of 39.1 ng/mL, dipstick uNGAL at its built-in threshold of >50 ng/mL, and UA at standard thresholds for leukocyte esterase (LE). A positive urine culture was defined as >100,000 CFUs/mL of a pathogen.
resultsA total of 211 patients were included (10% with positive urine cultures); 116 had paired catheterized and bagged samples. The agreement between catheterized and bagged samples at a quantitative uNGAL cutoff of ≥39.1 ng/mL was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.67 to 0.83) and 0.77 (95% CI = 0.68 to 0.84) at a uNGAL dipstick threshold of >50 ng/mL. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for uNGAL from a catheterized sample was 0.96 (95% CI = 0.89 to 1.00) compared to 0.93 (95% CI = 0.87 to -0.99) from a bagged sample. The sensitivities of catheterized sample quantitative and dipstick uNGAL (90.5%) were higher than UA at a LE threshold of ≥1+ (57.1%). Bagged-sample uNGAL had lower quantitative and dipstick specificities (both 73.8%) than from catheterized samples (94.3% and 95.3% respectively), similar to UA.
conclusionsuNGAL from bagged and catheterized samples showed insufficient agreement to be used interchangeably. The low specificity of uNGAL from bagged samples suggests that sampling technique affects uNGAL levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.