Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34665834›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Pain assessment in horses using automatic facial expression recognition through deep learning-based modeling.

Gabriel Carreira Lencioni, Rafael Vieira de Sousa, Edson José de Souza Sardinha, Rodrigo Romero Corrêa, Adroaldo José Zanella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. CowPainCheck: AI-based facial expression analysis for dairy cow welfare.Journal of animal science and technology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gabriel Carreira LencioniDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health of the School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FMVZ) of the University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5639-7794
Rafael Vieira de SousaDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering (FZEA), of the University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brazil.
Edson José de Souza SardinhaDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering (FZEA), of the University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rodrigo Romero CorrêaDepartment of Surgery of the School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FMVZ) of the University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Adroaldo José ZanellaDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health of the School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FMVZ) of the University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a machine vision algorithm to assess the pain level in horses, using an automatic computational classifier based on the Horse Grimace Scale (HGS) and trained by machine learning method. The use of the Horse Grimace Scale is dependent on a human observer, who most of the time does not have availability to evaluate the animal for long periods and must also be well trained in order to apply the evaluation system correctly. In addition, even with adequate training, the presence of an unknown person near an animal in pain can result in behavioral changes, making the evaluation more complex. As a possible solution, the automatic video-imaging system will be able to monitor pain responses in horses more accurately and in real-time, and thus allow an earlier diagnosis and more efficient treatment for the affected animals. This study is based on assessment of facial expressions of 7 horses that underwent castration, collected through a video system positioned on the top of the feeder station, capturing images at 4 distinct timepoints daily for two days before and four days after surgical castration. A labeling process was applied to build a pain facial image database and machine learning methods were used to train the computational pain classifier. The machine vision algorithm was developed through the training of a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) that resulted in an overall accuracy of 75.8% while classifying pain on three levels: not present, moderately present, and obviously present. While classifying between two categories (pain not present and pain present) the overall accuracy reached 88.3%. Although there are some improvements to be made in order to use the system in a daily routine, the model appears promising and capable of measuring pain on images of horses automatically through facial expressions, collected from video images.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsAutomated Facial RecognitionDatabases, FactualDeep LearningFacial RecognitionHorsesHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerOrchiectomyPain MeasurementVideo Recording

Identifiers

PMID34665834
PMCPMC8525760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.