Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34665817›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Newborn infant skin gene expression: Remarkable differences versus adults.

Marty O Visscher, Ping Hu, Andrew N Carr, Charles C Bascom, Robert J Isfort, Kellen Creswell, Rachel Adams, Jay P Tiesman, Karen Lammers, Vivek Narendran

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Epidermal Immunity and Function: Origin in Neonatal Skin.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marty O VisscherSkin Sciences, Program, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9266-4127
Ping HuThe Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, OH, United States of America.
Andrew N CarrThe Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, OH, United States of America.
Charles C BascomThe Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, OH, United States of America.
Robert J IsfortThe Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, OH, United States of America.
Kellen CreswellThe Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, OH, United States of America.
Rachel AdamsThe Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, OH, United States of America.
Jay P TiesmanThe Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, OH, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0632-0369
Karen LammersSkin Sciences, Program, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, United States of America.
Vivek NarendranPerinatal Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, United States of America.
Procter & Gamble (United States) · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At birth, human infants are poised to survive in harsh, hostile conditions. An understanding of the state of newborn skin development and maturation is key to the maintenance of health, optimum response to injury, healing and disease. The observational study collected full-thickness newborn skin samples from 27 infants at surgery and compared them to skin samples from 43 adult sites protected from ultraviolet radiation exposure, as the standard for stable, mature skin. Transcriptomics profiling and gene set enrichment analysis were performed. Statistical analysis established over 25,000 differentially regulated probe sets, representing 10,647 distinct genes, in infant skin compared to adult skin. Gene set enrichment analysis showed a significant increase in 143 biological processes (adjusted p < 0.01) in infant skin, versus adult skin samples, including extracellular matrix (ECM) organization, cell adhesion, collagen fibril organization and fatty acid metabolic process. ECM organization and ECM structure organization were the biological processes in infant skin with the lowest adjusted P-value. Genes involving epidermal development, immune function, cell differentiation, and hair cycle were overexpressed in adults, representing 101 significantly enriched biological processes (adjusted p < 0.01). The processes with the highest significant difference were skin and epidermal development, e.g., keratinocyte differentiation, keratinization and cornification intermediate filament cytoskeleton organization and hair cycle. Enriched Gene Ontology (GO) biological processes also involved immune function, including antigen processing and presentation. When compared to ultraviolet radiation-protected adult skin, our results provide essential insight into infant skin and its ability to support the newborn's preparedness to survive and flourish, despite the infant's new environment laden with microbes, high oxygen tension and potential irritants. This fundamental knowledge is expected to guide strategies to protect and preserve the features of unperturbed, young skin.

Indexed as

SkinAdultFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansInfant, NewbornMaleTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID34665817
PMCPMC8525758
OpenAlexW3205876780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.