Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34665801›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Experiment level curation of transcriptional regulatory interactions in neurodevelopment.

Eric Ching-Pan Chu, Alexander Morin, Tak Hou Calvin Chang, Tue Nguyen, Yi-Cheng Tsai, Aman Sharma, Chao Chun Liu, Paul Pavlidis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric Ching-Pan ChuMichael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8339-9277
Alexander MorinMichael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6525-5800
Tak Hou Calvin ChangMichael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0270-3490
Tue NguyenMichael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Yi-Cheng TsaiMichael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0810-953X
Aman SharmaMichael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8043-3804
Chao Chun LiuMichael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8645-2598
Paul PavlidisMichael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

Neuroinformatics for gene expression: networks, function and meta-analysisR01MH111099 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI PAVLIDIS, PAUL · 2016 to 2025
$3.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To facilitate the development of large-scale transcriptional regulatory networks (TRNs) that may enable in-silico analyses of disease mechanisms, a reliable catalogue of experimentally verified direct transcriptional regulatory interactions (DTRIs) is needed for training and validation. There has been a long history of using low-throughput experiments to validate single DTRIs. Therefore, we reason that a reliable set of DTRIs could be produced by curating the published literature for such evidence. In our survey of previous curation efforts, we identified the lack of details about the quantity and the types of experimental evidence to be a major gap, despite the theoretical importance of such details for the identification of bona fide DTRIs. We developed a curation protocol to inspect the published literature for support of DTRIs at the experiment level, focusing on genes important to the development of the mammalian nervous system. We sought to record three types of low-throughput experiments: Transcription factor (TF) perturbation, TF-DNA binding, and TF-reporter assays. Using this protocol, we examined a total of 1,310 papers to assemble a collection of 1,499 unique DTRIs, involving 251 TFs and 825 target genes, many of which were not reported in any other DTRI resource. The majority of DTRIs (965; 64%) were supported by two or more types of experimental evidence and 27% were supported by all three. Of the DTRIs with all three types of evidence, 170 had been tested using primary tissues or cells and 44 had been tested directly in the central nervous system. We used our resource to document research biases among reports towards a small number of well-studied TFs. To demonstrate a use case for this resource, we compared our curation to a previously published high-throughput perturbation screen and found significant enrichment of the curated targets among genes differentially expressed in the developing brain in response to Pax6 deletion. This study demonstrates a proof-of-concept for the assembly of a high resolution DTRI resource to support the development of large-scale TRNs.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainComputational BiologyDNAGene Expression RegulationGene Regulatory NetworksHumansMiceProtein BindingTranscription FactorsDNATranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID34665801
PMCPMC8565786
OpenAlexW3207472579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.