ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science2022
Mixing memory and desire: How memory reactivation supports deliberative decision-making.
Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Learning about causal relations that change over time: primacy and recency over long timeframes in causal judgments and memory.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2025Article
- A Bayesian Time-Varying Psychophysiological Interaction Model.Data science in science · 2025Article
- Context changes retrieval of prospective outcomes during decision deliberation.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- The affective gradient hypothesis: an affect-centered account of motivated behavior.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2024Review
- Cognitive Graphs: Representational Substrates for Planning.Decision (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Article
- A Sequential Sampling Approach to the Integration of Habits and Goals.Computational brain & behavior · 2024Article
- Are there jumps in evidence accumulation, and what, if anything, do they reflect psychologically? An analysis of Lévy Flights models of decision-making.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024Review
- Principles of cognitive control over task focus and task switching.Nature reviews psychology · 2023Article
- Computational mechanisms underlying latent value updating of unchosen actions.Science advances · 2023Article
- Memory precision and age differentially predict the use of decision-making strategies across the lifespan.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Developmental change in prefrontal cortex recruitment supports the emergence of value-guided memory.eLife · 2021Article
- Fixation patterns in simple choice reflect optimal information sampling.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- "Chasing the first high": memory sampling in drug choice.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Memories affect nearly every aspect of our mental life. They allow us to both resolve uncertainty in the present and to construct plans for the future. Recently, renewed interest in the role memory plays in adaptive behavior has led to new theoretical advances and empirical observations. We review key findings, with particular emphasis on how the retrieval of many kinds of memories affects deliberative action selection. These results are interpreted in a sequential inference framework, in which reinstatements from memory serve as "samples" of potential action outcomes. The resulting model suggests a central role for the dynamics of memory reactivation in determining the influence of different kinds of memory in decisions. We propose that representation-specific dynamics can implement a bottom-up "product of experts" rule that integrates multiple sets of action-outcome predictions weighted based on their uncertainty. We close by reviewing related findings and identifying areas for further research. This article is categorized under: Psychology > Reasoning and Decision Making Neuroscience > Cognition Neuroscience > Computation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.