Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34665339›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2021

Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer.

Thomas J Ettrich, Thomas Seufferlein

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06615830 (HIPANC-002 - Observational Performance Study of Transcriptome-Based OncoTreat/OncoTarget Testing With Patient-Derived Organoids in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06615830 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

HIPANC-002 - Observational Performance Study of Transcriptome-Based OncoTreat/OncoTarget Testing With Patient-Derived Organoids in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorProf. Dr. med. Dres. h.c. Jan Schmidt, MMERan2026 to 2031Enrolled185ConditionsPancreas Neoplasms, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic, Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Metastatic
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Chemotherapy-associated mutational process signature and genomic alterations associated with outcome in metastatic pancreatic cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas J EttrichDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University Hospital, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7654-2442
Thomas SeufferleinDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University Hospital, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany. thomas.seufferlein@uniklinik-ulm.de.
Universität Ulm · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementPancreatic cancer is mainly diagnosed at an advanced, often metastatic stage and still has a poor prognosis. Over the last decades, chemotherapy of metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPDAC) has proven to be superior to a mere supportive treatment with respect to both survival and quality of life. Recently, even sequential treatment of mPDAC could be established. Options for first-line treatment are combination chemotherapy regimens such as FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel when the performance status of the patient is good. For patients with poorer performance status, gemcitabine single-agent treatment is a valid option. Recently, the PARP inhibitor olaparib has been demonstrated to improve progression-free survival when used as a maintenance treatment in the subgroup of patients with mPDAC and a BRCA1/-2 germ line mutation having received at least 16 weeks of platinum-based chemotherapy. This group of patients also benefits from platinum-based chemotherapy combinations. Therefore, the BRCA1/-2 stats should be examined early in patients with mPDAC even when the occurrence of these mutations is only about 5% in the general Caucasian population. After the failure of first-line treatment, patients should be offered a second-line treatment if their ECOG permits further treatment. Here, the combination of 5-FU/FA plus nanoliposomal irinotecan has shown to be superior to 5-FU/FA alone with respect to overall survival. Immune checkpoint inhibitors like PD1/PD-L1 mAbs are particularly efficacious in tumors with high microsatellite instability (MSI-h). Limited data in mPDACs shows that only a part of the already small subgroup of MSI-H mPDACs (frequency about 1%) appears to benefit substantially from a checkpoint inhibitor treatment. The identification of further subgroups, e.g., tumors with DNA damage repair deficiency, gene fusions, as well as novel approaches such as tumor-organoid-informed treatment decisions, may further improve therapeutic efficacy.

Indexed as

Age FactorsBiomarkers, TumorClinical Decision-MakingClinical Trials as TopicCombined Modality TherapyDisease ManagementDisease SusceptibilityHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisRetreatmentTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, TumorChemotherapyMetastaticPancreatic cancerReviewSystemic therapy

Identifiers

PMID34665339
PMCPMC8526424
OpenAlexW3206817346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.