Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34665282›Full record

ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2021

[Fluid management in shock patients : New targets in the initial phase of shock].

Stefan John

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Fluid and vasopressor therapy in sepsis].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefan JohnMedizinische Klinik 8, Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität & Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Klinikum Nürnberg-Süd, 90471, Nürnberg, Deutschland. stefan.john@klinikum-nuernberg.de.
Nuremberg Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly i.v. fluid administration is a cornerstone in modern therapy of shock, especially in septic shock. However, there is much uncertainty concerning the amount and rate of fluid and which goals and measures could guide fluid management. Administering the optimal fluid volume is important because fluid overload can lead to severe negative consequences like organ failure and worsening of patient's outcome.

aimThis review aims to describe the importance of fluid therapy and discuss possible strategies in fluid management as well as possible measurements and goals to guide such therapy. RECENT

findingsThere is no single measurement to guide fluid management alone. It is important to assess fluid responsiveness, which together with multiple other parameters can be used to repeatedly assess optimal fluid management. However, it has also not been shown that assessing fluid responsiveness can improve outcome.

conclusionsAfter the initial resuscitation, further fluid administration should be determined by individual patient factors and measures of fluid responsiveness. A more restrictive fluid management with early vasopressor administration seems to be increasingly used in modern fluid management. However many questions regarding optimal fluid management remain to be solved.

Indexed as

SepsisShock, SepticFluid TherapyHumansResuscitationVasoconstrictor AgentsVasoconstrictor AgentsEarly goal-directed therapyFluid shiftsFluid therapySepsisVasoconstrictor agents

Identifiers

PMID34665282
OpenAlexW3206084835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.